Sunday, June 23, 2024
HomeCOVID-19A beginners’ guide to the Great Covid Con, Part 6: Manipulating the...

A beginners’ guide to the Great Covid Con, Part 6: Manipulating the death rate data


Continuing Paul Weston’s series of articles intended for those who have not yet heard the truth about the disaster caused by the response to the Covid non-pandemic. You can read the introduction and Part 1 here. Click on the numbers for Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5.

IF YOU have studiously ploughed through all the facts and figures so far, you must be wondering how on earth Western governments got away with the colossal fraud entailed in persuading us that Covid-19 deaths were enormously high throughout 2020. Ditto, that we were all equally threatened with death if we disobeyed the various ludicrous and tyrannical edicts crashing down upon us from the political, media, scientific and medical establishments.

What they did was actually very simple. Beautifully simple, in fact. They just applied the label of ‘Covid-19 death’ to perfectly natural and normal deaths of the old and the ill, along with the deaths by terminally unfortunate accident of the young and the healthy.

Before PCR testing became the norm, doctors were advised – without the actual necessity of looking at the recently departed – to label the death as a Covid-19 death if the deceased had shown any symptoms of Covid-19 such as breathlessness, fever, cough, cold etc. Needless to say, most old and ill people who die exhibit many of those symptoms.

After the PCR testing regime became the norm, all deaths were labelled as Covid-19 if the deceased had tested PCR positive. This included those who were dying from cancer, heart disease, stage-4 kidney disease etc. Mr X actually died of cancer, but Covid-19 was the label attributed to his death simply because he had tested PCR positive two months earlier.

Even worse, a perfectly healthy 21-year-old who died in a motorcycle accident was labelled a Covid-19 death if he had tested PCR positive three months previously. The government took some stick over this obviously fraudulent manipulation of mortality data, and decided to become less fraudulently insane by stating the PCR positive test must have taken place within 28 days of the death.

Though this lessened the distortion to a degree, all of this was still criminally fraudulent, obviously, and it laid the groundwork for even more criminal insanity with regard to the future vaccines.

I don’t want to get into the whole vaccine issue in this article, but bear the following in mind: Fit and healthy 30-year-old Mr Y was injected with the mRNA vaccine on January 1 2022. A few days later he felt a bit iffy and toddled along for a PCR test on January 5, and it returned a positive result. On January 15 2022, Mr Y suffered a heart attack while cycling and was pronounced dead at the scene.

The cause of death was listed as Covid-19. His family protested and said he had been feeling perfectly OK up to the date of the mRNA vaccine injection. Could the vaccine be responsible for his death, they asked the doctor. Of course not, she scoffed. Mr Y was technically unvaccinated, you see.

How is this possible? Western governments decreed it takes some days for mRNA vaccines to be effective. So, a 28-day duration was put in place to allow for the delayed efficiency and/or nasty side effects following vaccination. If a person died 27 days post vaccination, he/she was deemed technically unvaccinated.

Had they tested PCR positive within 28 days from PCR positive test to heart attack whilst cycling however, they died from Covid-19. Even if they had been mRNA vaccinated within the exact same time-frame.

Worse still, Mr Y will not only be fraudulently labelled as a Covid-19 death; he will also enter the government’s statistical database as being unvaccinated, even though the vaccine may well have killed him. In turn, the government and the health agencies will use his ‘unvaccinated’ death to encourage people to take the vaccine against Covid-19 death.

So simple. So wicked. So criminal. So obvious once your eyes are opened to the fraud.

Tomorrow: Flu deaths v Covid-19 deaths in 2020

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Paul Weston
Paul Weston
Paul Weston is a political commentator, concentrating on the various factors involved in the relentless war against Western civilisation.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.