The writer is in New Zealand
THE New Zealand Stuff newspaper has published a lengthy article headed ‘Fact checking claims about New Zealand’s 2022 death rate’. It is written with the help of the NZ Health Service (Te Whatu Ora) and Stats NZ, both of which have access to health data we have repeatedly asked to see, but to which we still have no access. In essence, our government is admitting that deaths are up to record levels in 2021, 2022, and 2023. Incredibly, they also say it is nothing to worry about.
According to the article, the record rises are due partly to Covid and mostly to the effect of an ageing population, but most definitely not due to mRNA vaccines. Yet the years with record mortality rates are uniquely linked to mRNA vaccination. (NZ had little Covid infection in 2021. We have written extensively and repeatedly about this at the Hatchard Report.)
We note that Our World in Data (referred to in the Stuff article and coincidentally Bill Gates’s favourite Covid data site), has used a statistical method to analyse NZ data that assumes our rises in population during 2015-2019 continued during the pandemic years: they didn’t. This distorts the analysis and makes it appear that rising deaths can be wholly explained as the continuation of a pre-existing trend: they cannot.
Te Whatu Ora’s suggestion in the article that only four people have died in New Zealand as a result of Covid vaccination is risible. We have the second highest excess death rate in the OECD, multiple studies have demonstrated that mRNA Covid vaccines are associated with cardiac illness (something acknowledged by Medsafe). Leaked data from the Wellington region shows that hospitalisation for heart attacks is up by 83 per cent. The claim that virtually none of these are the result of vaccination puts NZ in the forefront of gullible nations.
We have asked for mortality statistics by age, cause of death and crucially by vaccine status to be made available. Te Whatu Ora has these figures, but hasn’t released them. Why?
There is much published data now available from other countries pointing to concerning characteristics of rising excess deaths, so you might think Stuff and Te Whatu Ora are destroying their own credibility with every new protestation of innocence. For example recent figures released in the UK show excess deaths are affecting all age groups. Ditto for insurance data from the US.
Napoleon reportedly said ‘Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.’ Let’s sit back and consider this calmly. Is there actually an enemy? Hitler and Stalin controlled their populations by creating fictitious enemies or scapegoats, the international Jew and the international capitalist. They both succeeded in uniting the masses behind lies. Both managed the indoctrination of youth under the guise of education. Is someone similarly controlling us now?
Jacinda Ardern, Ashley Bloomfield, Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky and Boris Johnson have all exited stage left, Joe Biden is currently falling off the stage, but still there appears to be an overarching effort to keep the public misinformed, divided and blaming each other. Who is doing this? Apparently not one person. A self-sustaining mass movement has emerged from the chaos of the pandemic and the babbling morass of mainstream and social media.
There are of course key players and opinion-makers; these are numerous and they function within networks. There is a great deal of money involved. People and corporations have amassed vast fortunes on the back of pharmaceutical drugs, biotech investment, and pandemic contracts. They are paying people large sums, including PR firms and biddable scientists, to push a philosophy which, as a result, has embedded itself in the social consciousness.
How has this movement taken hold and why is it so impervious to fact? An article in the July 2023 issue of Scientific American holds a hint: ‘Brain Waves Synchronize when People Interact. The minds of social species are strikingly resonant’. This details a growing field of research I have been involved with for over forty years. According to the article, neuroscientists have found that when people converse or share an experience, their brain waves synchronise. ‘Neurons in corresponding locations of the different brains fire at the same time, creating matching patterns . . . Such work is beginning to reveal new levels of richness and complexity in sociability.’
In other words, intense levels of social and intellectual interaction lead to the formation of shared patterns of thinking. I discuss my experimental investigation of collective consciousness at length in my book Your DNA Diet in which I offer sound evidence that we influence each other even at a distance.
The criterion of truth is still evidence. If governments seek to hide data or promote false ideas of successful and safe genetic manipulation without sharing evidence, they are building castles in the sand which will inevitably be washed away on the next high tide of rational scientific investigation.
As long as we remain polarised, we are easily controlled. If discussion is suppressed, there are few ways ahead. Therefore the essential prerequisite for progress is the removal of the current restrictive barriers to public discussion which are being promoted by governments. Time was when the press and the public could and did ask questions; that facility needs to be restored. If that door remains closed how can damage be limited? How can lives be saved? Only with the greatest difficulty.