IN World War II, almost one million children in the UK were evacuated from the cities to the countryside to protect them from the dangers of bombing. Most of the adults remained in the cities and continued to work to keep the country going. Japan and Germany both instituted similar programmes. We can look back with great pride at what our ancestors and elders did to protect the young: they faced the danger themselves and put their children out of harm’s way.
Now, as we set about vaccinating our children against Covid-19, we are doing the exact opposite: we are putting our children at risk of death and injury to protect the old. This represents a moral depravity that puts us in the company of only the most barbaric societies in history, such as the Aztecs and Incas, who sacrificed children to placate their gods.
The instinct to protect the young is one of our deepest instincts. Indeed, it probably predates our species. Long before Homo erectus started the long trek across Africa, you can be sure that our pre-hominid ancestors would fight to the death to protect their young.
In any normal, sane time, when society was not victim of a media-induced mass hysteria, if a person suggested that we might somehow save a small number of old people by sacrificing children, that person would be treated as a pariah. Indeed, if such a situation did occur in a sane society, you can be sure that a huge number of elders would volunteer to be sacrificed to save the lives of the children.
Whether we look at this from an evolutionary or spiritual perspective, we can see that this behaviour is both noble and highly adaptive. It is nothing less than a sacred pact made between the past and the future, the old and the young – a true manifestation of hope and love. And, until very recently, any time someone broke this pact, they were treated with contempt. Consider, for example, how we think of the men who took places in the lifeboats of the Titanic ahead of women and children.
But something has happened to us as a people. Now, we are told that children – who do not suffer serious cases of Covid-19 unless they are deeply sick to begin with (and even then it’s vanishingly rare) – must be vaccinated to protect the older members of society. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, recently said with some relish: ‘Although the data shows that severe Covid-19 is rare in children, widespread vaccination is a critical tool to help stop transmission. That’s why I’m excited we have begun dosing participants aged 5 to 11.’
There are two things that must be noted here: 1) the Covid vaccines pose a significant risk of death and injury to everyone who takes them, and 2) there is no evidence that children can spread SARS-CoV-2 to adults. Let’s look at these two points quickly.
The UK’s Yellow Card system, which tracks adverse events related to vaccines, has logged 888,196 adverse events and 1,253 fatalities caused by the Covid vaccines in the UK alone. VAERS, the American equivalent, has logged 5,165 deaths and 25,359 serious injuries caused by Covid vaccines. Many experts believe that injuries and deaths are being massively under-reported.
Let that sink in for a second: At least 6,418 people have been killed by the Covid vaccines in the UK and USA. Tens of thousands have been seriously injured. There is no reason to think that children will not be killed or injured in similar numbers relative to their population. Indeed, there is evidence that more of them will be harmed, since higher rates of myocarditis have been reported for young vaccine recipients in the USA and Israel.
This much is certain: if we extend the Covid vaccination programme to children, scores of them will be killed and thousands will be injured in the UK alone. And that’s just in the short term: we can only guess what the long-term effects will be in terms of infertility, cancer and auto-immune disease.
As for children spreading the virus, the data show that children rarely, if ever, transmit SARS-CoV-2. In Sweden, where schools were kept open throughout the pandemic, teachers suffered no greater burden of Covid than other professions. Professor Mark Woolhouse, an epidemiologist from the University of Edinburgh, stated that ‘it is extremely difficult to find any instance anywhere in the world of a child transmitting to a teacher in school’.
If teachers, who spend hours a day in classrooms with dozens of children, aren’t catching Covid, then kids are not spreading the virus. Thus, the claim that children must be vaccinated to stop the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is false.
But, of course, this isn’t really about stopping transmission and achieving herd immunity. How do we know this? Because if this were about herd immunity, our governments would not be pushing vaccines on those who have recovered from Covid (natural immunity is at least as protective as vaccine-mediated immunity). Moreover, they would not be suppressing knowledge and use of ivermectin, which prevents nearly 100 per cent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
By ignoring natural immunity and suppressing drugs that prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, our governments have revealed their true goal: The goal is mass-vaccination itself, which will ensure billions of profits for Big Pharma and the tech companies who will run the ‘bio-security’ state on their behalf. And yearly ‘boosters’ and ‘variant top-ups’ will ensure that this is the gift that keeps on giving for the billionaires who own those companies.
So, we are not even asking our children to sacrifice their lives to protect the old, since children do not effectively transmit the virus. What we are really asking them to do is sacrifice their lives so that companies like Pfizer, Moderna, Google and Facebook can make obscene profits.
That’s right: We are sacrificing our children’s lives on the altar of Big Pharma and Big Tech. The term ‘evil’ is overused these days. But if killing children to enrich billionaires is not evil, then nothing is.
The true depth of their evil is shown by the methods they use. Our governments have hired experts in behavioural modification and persuasive technology to convince children to take the jab. Peer-pressure, shaming and outright lies have been brought to bear on children still in grade school. Preying upon children’s innocence and good nature to convince them to risk their lives so that billionaires can profit is a spectacle of evil to match anything in human history.
Of course, all of this is rather abstract. So, let’s make it real.
I want you to imagine all the children in your country gathered into a field. Some of their number will be chosen by lottery. You will have to go to the crowd and grasp the hand of one of those unlucky ones and look them in the eyes and say, ‘Come on now. Don’t fight it. This is to protect the elders.’ Then, you will have to lead that crying child away and slit its throat. Or perhaps you will merely have to maim the child with an iron bar to the spine.
Is this overheated language? Just because the inevitable deaths will take place in bedrooms, emergency rooms and hospital wards, are the simple facts of the matter any different? Are we not asking a number of children to die here? Does your distance from the crime make you any less morally culpable? You are part of this society.
There is going to come a time in the future when each of us will be asked, ‘What did you do when it was happening?’
May you now act in such a way that you are not ashamed of the answer you have to give.