Sunday, November 29, 2020
Home News Escape lockdown by flying to Dignitas

Escape lockdown by flying to Dignitas

-

HEALTH Secretary Matt Hancock has confirmed that people may break lockdown to travel abroad for assisted dying, saying that flying to the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland would be considered a ‘reasonable excuse’

In fact ‘assisted dying’ is already available in this country – it is called palliative care, and should be offered to all; however, Hancock’s intervention came in response to an outcry over the case of a former NHS worker with terminal breast cancer who said she was forced to bring forward plans for her suicide at the Zurich facility due to fears the new lockdown rules would prevent her from travelling. The 45-year-old said she felt driven to ‘go now, before I am truly ready’.

Yet the whole idea of assisted suicide is to bring death forward; nobody, including doctors, knows precisely how long patients will live, and many have outlived the most gloomy prognoses. One thing is sure, however: if allowed to seek help to commit suicide, a great many will ‘bring forward’ their deaths and no one will ever know how long they might otherwise have lived.

The ‘right to die’ – more accurately, the right to kill oneself – is presented as an individual matter into which the rest of society has no right to intrude. However, no man is an island. Death does not only involve the one who dies and, as Mr Hancock should know only too well, thanks to the Government’s policy of prioritising saving the NHS over saving lives there will be a great many more cases of terminal cancer; how gracious, then, for a Secretary of ‘Health and Social Care’ to allow such individuals to go somewhere else to be killed. It is no coincidence that euthanasia saves money for health care administrators.  

Can the public – especially those ‘past their sell-by date’ – really trust a Government that forced care homes to take untested patients from hospitals and presided over the blanket issue of ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ notices in care homes for the elderly and mentally disabled? 

All this was justified because of Covid, and so was the decision to send abortion pills to women through the post, a ‘temporary’ measure that looks set to be made permanent. Abortion clinics have remained open throughout the pandemic as have Switzerland’s suicide clinics; it would not do to allow a deadly pandemic to get in the way of killing.

According to the Telegraph, Mr Hancock rebuffed calls for a government-led review of the current legislation on assisted suicide, insisting that the Government was ‘neutral’ on the matter and that any attempt to change the law must come from Parliament.

The Parliamentary question about the woman who wanted to go to Switzerland was tabled by Conservative MP Andrew Mitchell, a former Cabinet minister, who is an advocate of ‘assisted dying’. No doubt he will be buoyed by Mr Hancock’s response, despite the fact that the last attempt to change the law, in 2015, was soundly defeated once Parliamentarians had had the opportunity to examine all the evidence of the terrible outcomes afflicting societies where the law has been changed. It is now even more clear how easily societies can slide down the slippery slope of convenience dressed up as compassion.

As has been admitted publicly by one euthanasia advocate, legalising assisted suicide with ‘strict safeguards’ is seen by them as a way to ‘get our foot in the door’ prior to throwing it wide open when dying has become a way of life. 

Mr Hancock has effectively changed the law, since he has accepted in fact that people can legally leave the country to do elsewhere what is illegal in this country – regarding which the Government is ‘neutral’. It could be argued that like ‘strict safeguard’, a ‘strictly neutral’ stance on assisted suicide is a mere prelude to accepting it. He did so, apparently, in response to the ‘outcry’ over this particular case, but significantly, the ‘outcry’ over people not getting the treatment they need because of Covid has produced no such swift and efficient response. And given the dire mental health impact of Covid restrictions, it is hardly a helpful response to tell people struggling with sickness and depression in a seemingly endless series of lockdowns that the only way to end it all is to go abroad to end it all.

Even if Covid health policy was initially made on the hoof, it is now reprehensible to take such decisions in full knowledge of what they could be covering up. Most bizarrely, Matt Hancock’s decision was made for ‘health’ reasons, and indeed travelling abroad to die could be justified on health grounds, given that those who do so will no longer be ill, because they will no longer be alive. It is argued that such people are ‘going to die anyway’ – now that will be guaranteed. And the Government will be off the hook, having given those suffering under lockdown the false freedom of death.

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Ann Farmer
Ann Farmer is the author of By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control, and the Abortion Movement (Catholic University of America, 2008).

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.


Follow us!

Share this post