THE Government’s number one snake oil that it sells us is tax.
Tax can seemingly fix anything. Supposedly it doesn’t harm the economy when applied to labour, goods, capital, profits or imports. Somehow, though, it does reduce demand for alcohol, tobacco and, perhaps in the future, sugar, salt and meat.
An intelligent taxman is one who can hold two contradictory effects in his mind at the same time and still retain the ability to keep a straight face.
We can add a new snake oil to the salesman’s apothecary of quackery: Mass injections of experimental ‘medicine’, designed to turn us all into GMO (genetically modified organism) humans.
Hyperbolic claims that this panacea would make us all safe, get us to herd immunity and get us back to normal were just fraudulent sales pitches to get us to part with our hard-earned liberties.
Like all good snake oil, it did nothing claimed on the label, but it has adulterated the immune systems and vital organs of those who were persuaded to take a risk that was carefully hidden from them.
It turns out the massive Freedom Carrot of mRNA-juice doesn’t prevent infection, transmission or hospitalisation. An armful may prove harmful in ways that will be claimed to have been unforeseen.
Advocates of the gene jabs like to stress relative risk reduction, as it misleads the ignorant public into believing they are receiving good medicine. In fact, it is not much better than snake oil, as revealed by the choice of risk reduction advertised.
There are two kinds of risk reduction. In a nutshell, the difference is in the denominator. Consider two groups, each of 100 individuals. One group is unvaccinated, the other is vaccinated.
Let’s assume that in the unvaccinated group two people subsequently test positive for Covid, but in the vaccinated only one person does. So we have a one-person gain. How we express that improvement is key:
1. Absolute risk reduction: A one-person improvement from 100 people vaccinated is one per cent. Not very impressive. Put a dummy in its mouth and put it to bed in the small print.
2. Relative risk reduction: A one-person improvement from the two that would have fallen ill is 50 per cent. Much better. Put that in the mouth of a dummy and shout about it till you wake the dead.
While near-useless for their claimed effects, the clot-shots will introduce a new caste system. If you are reading this, then there’s a good chance you will be in the Lower Caste (even if you are reading this in a GCHQ dungeon, keeping an eye on the troublemakers, patting yourself on the back for being on the winning side … you won’t be, you’ll be down here with the rest of us).
The High Caste will not be receiving the same unhealthy, addictive, perpetually-injected chemical manacles as the rest of us. Their blood will remain pure and black. If they receive any shot for the cameras, it’ll be saline.
Members of the nomenklatura had their own bar open when ours were shuttered. They feel free to visit their comfort women when our partners are in enforced chastity.
In the future they will only ingest real meat and real vegetables; real alcohol and real cigars; real sugar and real salt, while we subsist on mass-produced MREs. That’s Meals Ready to Excrete.
The coming autumn/winter will perhaps be the final chance for the Government to blame the public for the consequences of its actions. A dwindling cohort of Untouchables, the unvaccinated, will be ‘othered’ as scapegoats to account for the ineffectiveness of the experimental witch’s brew.
Of course, the real reason that the double-jabbed will fall ill is the woefully low absolute risk reduction achieved by these concoctions, combined with their damaged immune systems.
Our good natures have been taken advantage of. We have been betrayed by immoral actors who would curse us with a new caste system.
Many articles appearing in the media still promote the standard British explanation for shambolic governance, the I-word: Incompetence. At some point we will have to cross a Rubicon and seriously consider using the T-word …