Sunday, June 23, 2024
HomeKathy GyngellHow will they explain away these latest excess death figures?

How will they explain away these latest excess death figures?


NO ONE can have missed the curious omission in the various explanations proffered by medical experts, public health officials and the mainstream media for the undeniable and dramatic rise in excess deaths as reported in the Lancet before Christmas which only this last week caught the eye of social media. Katie Hopkins did a particularly effective filleting of the headlines on X: 

Higher than at any time in 5 yearsFirst six months of 2023, 26,000 excess deaths particularly in young and middle aged males. And the main cause of it? Heart conditions: 47% inexplicable heart conditions50-64 age group just in the 13 month period after Covid, 44% higher. And as she says to the MSM: ‘You are still not talking about it.’

But even the bold Katie’s challenge to the MSM did not mention that all too obvious elephant in the room of explanation – vaccine injury. 

It took Mark Steyn, who has been on cracking form on his website this week, to highlight the correlation with the jab that should be staring Katie’s resolutely in-denial former MSM colleagues in the face. On Tuesday he gave a searing rundown on ‘life and death in Expertstan’ though it was Canada’s stats that were in his sightline, not the UK’s. There, he says, ‘Unknown Cause’ is rampaging ‘from Nunavut igloos to the Hamas branch office in Montreal’. In one of the most jabbed nations on earth – ‘a rate of ninety-one per cent, the highest in the G7, by some distance (UK and US both at eighty per cent)’ – in 2019 the age-standardised death rate was 830.5 per 100,000 people. In 2022 it was 972.5. And that, as he has pointed out ‘a gazillion times on telly’, is the opposite of what’s meant to happen post-pandemic. After the Spanish Flu he explained, the mortality rate fell because people who would otherwise have died in 1924 had already died in 1919, a phenomenon that is visible in Eastern Europe post covid ‘but nowhere in the Dominion of Death.’  Read his full account here. 

The shocking thing is that if the MSM dare to suggest here that our excess death rates are anything to do with the covid ‘vaccines’, despite all the ‘additions to the side effects column’ (turbo boosted cancers and insulin resistance, to name but two), as Mark also reported, they’ll be clobbered by Ofcom for covid misinformation as he was. Yet the hard evidence of vaccine adverse events data has been in the public domain since the summer of 2021 albeit massively underreported. It is there for them to see if they bother to excavate the MHRA’s ‘interactive format data’ (updated when they feel like it) as we do. To anyone reading the Yellow card breakdowns we’ve been publishing on TCW since July 2021, excess deaths will hardly come as a surprise.

The latest headlines – and fatalities – from their most recent updated Yellow Card data follow:

·         1,581,588 reported reactions to date, 75 per cent of which the MHRA class as serious*;

·         1,238 more people have been impacted by an adverse event, 37 with a fatal outcome, in the nine weeks since the last report;

·         2,633 acknowledged fatalities to date, 413 of whom were of ‘unknown age’.

All of the above may be fewer than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA, figures that don’t begin to report deaths from turbo charged cancer for example. The summary follows:

MHRA Yellow Card reporting summary up to December 27 2023

New interactive format data

Adult & Child – Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent)

Government data (archived) up to Sept 2022 showed 53.8million people had received a 1st dose UK-wide.

By week ending 31 December 2023, 70.2 per cent (7,835,586 out of 11,164,326) of all people aged over 65 years who are living in England had been vaccinated with an autumn 2023 booster dose.

National Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report – Week 1 report (up to week 52 2023 data) January 4, 2024 (

Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports – 178,217 (Pfizer-mono) + 6,062 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 249,034 (AZ) + 43,147 (Moderna-mono) + 5,665 (Moderna-bivalent) + 179 (Novavax) + 2,932 (Unknown brand) = 485,236 people impacted (increase of 1,238 in nine weeks)

Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.5 per cent of all reports

126,233 (Pfizer-mono) + 4,668 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 193,009 (AZ) + 31,229 (Moderna-mono) + 4,156 (Moderna-bivalent) + 115 (Novavax) + 2,100 (Unknown) = 361,510

46,764 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 12.9 per cent of all serious reports

Increase of 37 reports with fatal outcome in nine weeks

Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.0 per cent

51,079 (Pfizer-mono) + 1,333 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,602 (AZ) + 11,822 (Moderna-mono) + 1,458 (Moderna-bivalent) + 63 (Novavax) + 736 (Unknown) = 121,093

Overall 1 in 111 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event (assuming one person submits only one report)

1 in 149 people injected experiences an adverse event classified as SERIOUS*

1 in 184 reports are associated with a fatality, which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA

Reactions – 514,725 (Pfizer-mono) + 16,338 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 883,707 (AZ) + 141,865 (Moderna-mono) + 15,575 (Moderna-bivalent) + 490 (Novavax) + 8,888 (Unknown) = 1,581,588

Fatal – 905 (Pfizer-mono) + 61 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1,423 (AZ) + 96 (Moderna-mono) + 51 (Moderna-bivalent) + 1 (Novavax) + 96 (Unknown) = 2,633 = 0.5 per cent of all reports (increase of 37 reports with fatal outcome in nine weeks)

413 of the above fatalities were of ‘Unknown Age’ = 15.7 per cent of all fatalities,and >149 were of ‘Unknown Sex’ = 5.6 per cent of all fatalities

*MHRA definition of ‘serious’ – patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter

See here for full reports.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngell
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.