Tuesday, May 28, 2024
HomeNewsKathy Gyngell:  Cameron can't win in a contest defined by Labour’s Big...

Kathy Gyngell:  Cameron can’t win in a contest defined by Labour’s Big State fantasy politics


My least favourite interviewer was at it again yesterday morning on the BBC’s Today programme.  Mishal Husain was castigating again the much beleaguered Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt.

Conservative Party HQ  seems to be fielding him on a near daily basis. He deserves  commendation for calmness under pressure – for his stalwart if misguided defence of the party’s nightmare commitment to the doomed National Health Service.  It is a cross he alone seems to bear.

Saturday morning he was on to defend (yes defend) the Conservatives’ newish £8 billion pledge of extra spending to plug an emerging black hole in the NHS budget. Mishal had harried him on this point earlier in the week.

I really don’t know who is deciding the Tories’ reactive election strategy on this one but Mishal had a point –  if  Jeremy couldn’t commit to ‘funding’ the £8 billion shortfall three days ago how could he now?

Aren’t we in the realm of fantasy politics, she said.  Indeed. In fact, it is the first sensible thing I have heard her say, ever. It is only sad that her scepticism does not appear to extend  to Labour’s tick box mansion tax or some such other scenario  for ‘funding’ their ‘upfront’ £2.5 billion  extra to feed the ever voracious and never to be sated NHS baby.

The truth is that all these pledges and financial commitments  through to 2020 are fantastical  and the bribes of a fantasy election. Who knows what will have happened to interest rates by then – or to the pound for that matter?

The fantasy concept it worth dwelling on.  I also heard it from  James Bartholomew  (author of The Welfare State We’re In)  earlier this week at the launch of his latest book, The Welfare of Nations, at the Institute of Economic Affairs.

He asserted that what we are going through in the UK  is a fantasy election  – one marked by a complete absence of debate about the most fundamentally critical issues of our time, about which our political class is  either supremely complacent or in denial. How right he is.

There is, he says, no mention of  the UK’s mass illiteracy problem.  Fifteen per cent of all British school leavers are functionally illiterate in this, the world’s fifth largest economy, with the  4th highest standard of living in the EU. Complacency about such problems is extraordinary.

Nor is time or place given to proper debate about health funding, despite our imploding and byzantine taxpayer and borrowing funded health system.   There is no looking outwards to other countries with more effective health systems, like Singapore’s, which Bloomberg ranked as the most efficient in the world in 2014. It is based on a system of compulsory savings, subsidies, and price controls.

Our form of political democracy, Bartholomew said, locks the parties into competitive  but meaningless bribes –  particularly at election time. Who will promise more from the overburdened but under-performing  State, whether these promises are realisable or not?

As Ryan Bourne of the IEA points out in his review of Bartholomew’s ‘tremendous new book’, what we have ended up with is not Francis Fukuyama’s ‘end of history’ capitalist, liberal democracies as the zenith of government but with the capitulation of an advanced economy to ‘welfare statism’, with quite disastrous outcomes for health and education.

Many other pleasant, advanced countries with welfare states  are less religiously committed to these state monopolies. Most will have adopted  one or another more efficient variant.

These also include overhauling means-tested benefits in favour of a social insurance model of welfare, with lower benefit rates and a flat tax  to replace  a system  badly designed in principle and far too complex in practice.

But should we blame our political class for their inward-looking approach and their scrabbling over the meaningless minutiae of political debate? Are they  to blame for their unwillingness  to learn from elsewhere or is it our particular system of democracy that is responsible? That is what Bartholemew thinks.  I am not so sure.  I think the BBC monopoly – far more responsible for influencing and driving public opinion  than the ever declining newspaper market – plays a huge part in this.

The BBC’s pressure to keep Britain’s intellectual life and political class parochial and state-solution oriented is relentless.  And its favourite target is the Conservative Party, who they are constantly ’shaming’ into ‘cultural’ line.

Mr Cameron’s huge mistake was to buy into this game – one that he can never win  – of being as good and as committed to the State as Labour.  He needed to be be bold and field the necessary alternative.  He did not do it last time and he is not, sadly, doing it this time.

Mishal’s accusation of fantasy politics, though true,  is a bit rich in the circumstances. Not least because it was just another way of showing the Conservatives however hard they commit to Labour’s fantasy state solutions, they will never win.

Jeremy Hunt, who seems to be an intelligent man, surely must have pondered this as he returned from this, his latest in a long line of haranguing by the BBC.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngell
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.