Sunday, June 16, 2024
HomeKathy GyngellKathy Gyngell: The media should stop ignoring the link between cannabis and...

Kathy Gyngell: The media should stop ignoring the link between cannabis and violence


CNN’s Don Lemon is under fire for making the elementary observation that some of the Ferguson protesters planning violence and mayhem were smoking pot, according to Cliff Kincaid last week in an article on Accuracy in Media, an American website.

Why? Because linking dope to violence is either taboo for most of the media or something reporters and commentators are simply ignorant of.

Reporting from the scene, CNN’s Lemon had said, “Maybe a minute, two minutes ago we heard a gunshot and watched people scattering. And we’re watching people on the roofs of cars, on the tops of cars and…Obviously there’s a smell of marijuana here as well.”

It was these comments that sparked a fierce backlash on social media, with many members of the online community apparently accusing him of “adding fire to the flames and promoting his own agenda.”

Yet it may well have been the marijuana, not Lemon’s observation, that added fire to the flames. He was just pointing out the obvious. Are journalists supposed to ignore the use of mind-altering substances by demonstrators planning the burning and looting of businesses?

That dope played a role in the August shooting of Michael Brown, an 18-year-old black man, by Darren Wilson, a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri was omitted in The Washington Post’s coverage of the grand jury proceedings that decided against indicting Wilson. DeForest Rathbone, Chairman of the National Institute of Citizen Anti-Drug Policy (NICAP), made this point in a letter to the paper:

“… In a glaring example of media bias exacerbating racial tensions in the Michael Brown shooting, Post reporters left out the key exculpatory fact in the grand jury finding officer Darren Wilson not guilty: The fact that Michael Brown tested positive for marijuana, which could explain his irrational violent behavior, not only in the convenience store which he strong-arm robbed while physically attacking the store clerk, but also in provoking the violent confrontation with police officer Darren Wilson,” Rathbone wrote.

The role of cannabis in inducing paranoid and violent behaviour is also routinely ignored in British press reporting.  In a series of attacks since 2000 – most notably the barbaric murder of soldier Lee Rigby –  it has later turned out that the perpetrators were either under the influence of cannabis or habitual users.

Peter Hitchens is the honourable exception to this rule and has been prepared to raise the relationship between cannabis addiction and abuse, mental illness and violence.

He is right to do so. The evidence is indisputably there. In fact it has been in the public domain since the Dunedin Study published its large-scale analysis of mental disorder and violence (Mental Disorders and Violence in a Total Birth Cohort: Results from the Dunedin Study, Louise Arseneault et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry, Vol 57, October 2000, 986)

Its key findings were:

  • Eleven per cent of the sample’s risk of becoming a violent offender was uniquely attributable to alcohol dependence, 28 per cent to marijuana dependence and 9.6 per cent to schizophrenia.
  • Having marijuana dependence and schizophrenia spectrum disorder more than doubled their risk of violence.
  • They were more likely to have used substances before offending, to perceive threat in the environment and to have a history of conduct disorder.

Regardless of whether regular cannabis use was the causative factor in the first place in triggering schizophrenia, it found that for anyone with another mental health condition, cannabis is an aggravating factor as far as violence is concerned.

Cannabis has a paranoia-inducing effect (defined as an excessive belief that other people are trying to harm us) even for those with no history of mental illness at all, a recent Oxford study has confirmed.

What the effects on group behaviour are when a significant section of the crowd is high on cannabis, I don’t know. Nor do I know of any research that would shed light on this.

Rathbone is right. It is high time responsible journalists focused on this problem. As he says: “If it weren’t for the mainstream media’s reverence for the ‘sacred cow’ of marijuana, they would see the valid scientific studies showing that pot is currently being produced in varying strengths from a mildly intoxicating 2 per cent THC up to school-shooter-psychosis-inducing 40-70 per cent THC. And that early childhood use of pot is a major cause of psychosis and violent behaviour…which could be the ‘unknown motive’ frequently cited in news articles on the Ferguson affair.”

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngell
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.