LOCKDOWNS and dubious rules and guidelines for a virus which has never been proved to exist were introduced in 2020. Even with a parliamentary committee conclusion that a former PM lied to the House we are still left wondering what if any legislation supported those rules and guidelines. Many Freedom of Information requests have been made to establish beyond doubt what statute supported the issuance of fixed penalty notices for Covid non-compliance, but so far, the requests remain unanswered.
There is not a single verified electron microscope image of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, yet we have all seen drawings of it, presumably based on what other coronaviruses look like. The genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV- 2 virus cannot be known because the virus was never purified and its sequence never published. It makes one wonder what genetic sequence they thought they were testing using a PCR test which was invented to analyse DNA and not viral material.
This was all explained by Dr Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test, but he was ignored by the public figures of the time such as Patrick Vallance, Chris Whitty, the Sage committee members and Professor Christian Drosten of the Charite Hospital in Berlin. Drosten was the first to change his mind over the suitability of the PCR test and in so doing influenced the World Health Organisation’s decision to use the test to identify ‘cases’ for which it was not suitable.
Even if it could be partially used with some certainty, the results depended on the degree of amplification/magnification of the sample, which had to remain under 18 times. In the event the amplification exceeded 25 and sometimes went as high as 40, producing an image of so much random material that any safe analysis was impossible, though useful to those who wished to declare that the infection had spread like wildfire. It was the greatest deception of decades and allowed badly informed politicians and zealous members of the public to behave in the most hostile and unprovoked way towards those with whom they came in contact.
The jobsworths quickly moved to enforce their rules on the public in restaurants, pubs, shops, cafes and schools; they demanded separation from relatives in care homes and hospitals, even restrictions at funerals, all based on nothing but fear and hearsay. In the name of a public health emergency that never was, neighbour snitched on neighbour as if the events in 1930s Germany had been forgotten.
Emergency Use Authorisation followed for untested vaccines, so-called to make everyone believe they were similar to the many inoculations that had gone before. But these new jabs were based on a new concept of injecting not a small dose of the infection that we wished to avoid, in order to strengthen our immune systems, but an injection of a spike protein that would kick in when infection was detected. Despite the reporting of adverse results in the US and the UK the reports were generally ignored and so the toll of adverse effects and deaths went unreported as if they were irrelevant. Meanwhile cheap and normally readily available treatments for respiratory infections were either banned or made unavailable to justify the case for Emergency Use Authorisation. Today we see recorded the largest vaccine adverse effects of any medical experiment in history where previously such results would have brought about an instant moratorium. Worse still was the rush to give the big pharmaceutical companies immunity from prosecution with the responsibility falling on governments who have taken an age even to process claims let alone offer compensation.
Because SARS-CoV-2 had been removed from the list of Notifiable Infectious Diseases in early March 2020, the coroner did not have to be notified nor a jury inquest held so vital medical information was never examined and the death certificates were allowed to specify a Covid cause despite the victim often dying from other unrelated conditions.
Now to add insult to injury we begin the process of a public inquiry which during the opening days has heard it suggested that austerity prevented adequate planning for just such an emergency. Total nonsense, of course, but when lawyers can smell a winning number it is hard to differentiate between what is essential and what is trivial in an inquiry which will run for years and cost over £100million. Those called to give evidence will be selected and we can be sure they won’t include those expert individuals who expressed their thoughts and reservations during the three years since 2020.
Viral and bacterial infections frequently last for around six weeks and then fade away or mutate. That is why, despite trying since the 1960s, no one has been successful in producing a vaccine against the common cold. For Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca or others to suggest they have done so is the greatest lie and is nothing but a scam promoted by those who have made billions out of others’ misery. Pfizer alone in 2022 made over $1trillion. The Coronavirus 2020 Act allowed the Treasury to borrow and spend £720billion before additional borrowing was approved to issue loans, grants and furlough payments and that was all in addition to Test and Trace and the cost of the vaccine programme. We have witnessed our public-sector debt increase by over £1trillion in three years and still the borrowing continues and now we must increase interest rates to match rates in other countries otherwise our government won’t be able to borrow the sums necessary to keep UK Ltd in business and meet its liabilities.
Lies and deceit are all part of the government’s armoury as today they try to blame us for the rapid rise in the cost of living which has forced them to increase interest rates, never once accepting all the blame for their and the Bank of England’s incompetence.
Will we ever hear any of this in the Covid Inquiry? Of course not. What an absolute disgrace.