Monday, May 27, 2024
HomeCOVID-19NHS pushes covid ‘Spring Booster’ jab as injuries and fatalities mount

NHS pushes covid ‘Spring Booster’ jab as injuries and fatalities mount


DESPITE the mounting and incontrovertible evidence of the risks – including fatal ones – associated with the mRNA novel gene therapy jabs that against the evidence purport to protect against covid, the NHS is pushing a further ‘Spring Booster’. That this will further turbo-charge cancer in the vulnerable population, as Angus Dalgleish explained in TCW on Monday, bothers them not one jot.

You can read the UKHSA’s specious justification here for the 75 pluses to get their nth jab. Though protection is starting to wane (again, it acknowledges) ‘current vaccines provide good protection against severe disease and hospitalisation’. This it asserts with no attempt to provide any evidence heroically claiming that ‘those who received a vaccine were around 50% less likely to be admitted to hospital with COVID-19 from 2 weeks following vaccination, compared to those who remained unvaccinated’.

You may remember that it was Mark Steyn’s questioning of this article of faith on air that ‘did’ for him. Ofcom ruled it was in breach of their (covid misinformation) rules and GB News (to their eternal shame) capitulated. Needless to say Mark’s interpretation, as relayed by Ofcom, that there was ‘only one conclusion’ from this comparison – ‘that the third vaccination caused increased levels of infection, hospitalisation and death’, has proved to be far from misleading. Bang on correct in fact.

Typically the contrary Government claim, that the unvaccinated were at higher risk of hospitalisation and death, pushed and endlessly repeated by the BBC and many other media sources, Ofcom chose not to investigate let alone rule on. Yet the claim has been been comprehensively debunked by Fenton and Neil who show it to be based on deliberately murky record keeping. But thanks to Ofcom’s benign response to State propaganda, ‘this statistical illusion of efficacy manufactured by simple miscategorisation’ continues unchecked as demonstrated in the NHS’s latest jab harassment communications.

Slipshod medical ethics are not just the preserve of the government and its satellites. The CEO of Boots and Pharmadoctor started offering Covid-19 vaccinations privately to healthy children aged 12 years and above just when the NHS effectively withdrew the vaccines for all healthy under-75s. They have not bothered to acknowledge let alone reply to Professor Dalgleish’s and Dr Ros Jones’s condemnation of this reckless initiative. Do share their letter far and wide. It is a corker.

Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is as bad as the rest. You’d think a letter sent by an alliance of medical professionals calling for an immediate suspension of the covid vaccine booster programme, pending an immediate review into all aspects of covid vaccine safety, would have at least deserved acknowledgment. But no, not a dicky bird, Dr Jones tells me. 

It’s because neither the DHSC, UKHSA or Ofcom will ever let the facts get in the way of a good story that we keep you informed on the official adverse event data they all so studiously ignore – data in the public domain but never publicised by the MHRA. The latest of their Yellow Card updates, only after painstakingly digging through the tables, reveals 212 more adverse events and nine more fatalities in the last four weeks. Our summary of this data follows below.

However the near-doubling of numbers waiting for cardiac care since 2020 (from 233,000 to more than 400,000) and the known evidence of vaccine-induced myocarditis – unmentioned of course in the newpapers reports as a possible factor – has prompted us to prepare a separate special cardiac, vascular and stroke related report as well. This we will publish in the coming days.

MHRA Yellow Card reporting summary up to March 27 2024

Interactive format data

Adult & Child – Primary & Boosters (mono/bivalent)

Government data (archived) up to Sept 2022 showed 53.8million people had received a 1st dose UK-wide

Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports – 178,464 (Pfizer-mono) + 6,180 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 249,368 (AZ) + 43,209 (Moderna-mono) + 5,714 (Moderna-bivalent) + 188 (Novavax) + 3,003 (Unknown brand) = 486,126 people impacted (increase of 212 reports in 4 weeks)

Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.5 per cent of all reports

126,452 (Pfizer-mono) + 4,776 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 193,260 (AZ) + 31,265 (Moderna-mono) + 4,190 (Moderna-bivalent) + 122 (Novavax) + 2,158 (Unknown) = 362,223

More than 46,870 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 12.9 per cent of all serious reports

Overall 1 in 11 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event (assuming one person submits only one report)

1 in 149 people injected experiences an adverse event classified as SERIOUS*

Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.0 per cent

51,097 (Pfizer-mono) + 1,338 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,651 (AZ) + 11,843 (Moderna-mono) + 1,472 (Moderna-bivalent) + 66 (Novavax) + 748 (Unknown) = 121,215

Reactions – 515,629 (Pfizer-mono) + 16,663 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 884,802 (AZ) + 142,062 (Moderna-mono) + 15,695 (Moderna-bivalent) + 512 (Novavax) + 9,073 (Unknown) = 1,584,436

1 in 181 reports are associated with a fatality, which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA

Fatal – 915 (Pfizer-mono) + 66 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1,457 (AZ) + 101 (Moderna-mono) + 52 (Moderna-bivalent) + 97 (Unknown) = 2,688 = 0.5 per cent of all reports (increase of 9 reports with fatal outcome in 4 weeks)

450 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 16.7 per cent of all fatalities, and 184 are of ‘Unknown Sex’ = 6.8 per cent of all fatalities

MHRA definition of ‘serious’ – patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter

For full reports see here.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngell
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.