Keep Britain Free
Monday, September 28, 2020
Keep Britain Free
Home News Paul T Horgan: Language matters. The Left resorts to multicultural euphemisms to...

Paul T Horgan: Language matters. The Left resorts to multicultural euphemisms to conceal true horrors

-

We are all aware of the evil side of multiculturalism and its assault on women’s rights. We are also aware how these are routinely ignored by left-wing feminists and the Labour Party, despite their empty platitudes to the contrary.

There’s female genital mutilation, forced marriage and honour killing. Some British girls may be experience all three while living in this country. If they do not, there is always the risk of being a victim of the organised gang rape of the kind we have seen in Rotherham and elsewhere.

But consider the terms for the first three. They are actually the least emotive phrases for these barbaric and cruel acts.

How a thing is described changes people’s attitudes to it. Controlling and restricting language directs political thought and policy. There does not seem to be such a thing as a right-wing sociologist. The Left have prevailed in assigning terms to barbarism to dilute exactly how heinous the barbarity is.

Consider ‘honour killing’. All instances of ‘honour killing’ are in fact murder. All murders are killings, but not all killings are murder. The use of the word ‘honour’ is some kind of multiculturalist justification, a perceived necessity and thus perversely justified. The ‘killing’ had to take place to protect the family’s ‘honour’. What rot.

There is no honour in murder. Irony has no place in describing the practice. People should tell it like it is. This is ‘culture murder’. Murder is always murder. It is fitting that the spiritual heirs to Stalin would have us think otherwise.

‘Female genital mutilation’ was for years called ‘female circumcision’, by those who would conceal the true horror. This was typical muddled socialist thinking, trying to find equivalence where none existed, by equating this uncivilised and gruesome practice with the Jewish Brit Milah ceremony for baby boys.

It was many years before this term was changed. It is a technical term, usually abbreviated to FGM, which makes it even more abstract. ‘Daughter maiming’ tells the true story.

Since I last wrote a piece on this there has been an arrest, but only because state sector workers are threatened with dismissal if they do not report concerns. It took a threat, instead of human decency, to protect an eight-year-old girl. British values counted for nothing.

‘Forced marriage’ debases the formal celebration of a union by indicating coercion. The fact that a woman has a man imposed on her through some form of contract is actually irrelevant. The use of the word ‘marriage’ indicates that perhaps the female victim will eventually accept her fate and accept the union. No British girl should be driven to  give her body to a strange man just because her family requires it.

This is actually rape with a ceremony preceding it. ‘Arranged rape’ is a better term for what goes on here. The marriage part is not the actual concern.

Finally we come to the crime without a name, which was found to be the acceptable price of community cohesion in Labour-controlled Rotherham and elsewhere. Organised gang rape, when it is the consequence of importing girls from Eastern Europe and elsewhere into brothels, is clamped down on hard by police and women’s rights campaigners. When the victims are British girls in care and the perpetrators are from a closed community that votes en bloc for Labour, they are ignored, presumably because this is seen as a diversity issue by the appropriately trained state workers and police. And Labour politicians need votes, even in Rotherham.

‘Diversity rape’ is a fitting description. Had there not been diversity as a factor in these appalling crimes, the gangster rapists would have been behind bars a lot sooner.

Culture murder, daughter maiming, arranged rape, and diversity rape. These are the evil consequences of multiculturalism. Socialist politicians, sociologists and state sector workers do their damnedest to brush these under the carpet by using the most sterile terms possible. The victims are British girls and women. Dear reader, I implore you to start thinking and using these terms in discourse and persuading other people to do so. Link to this article. Tweet it. Let us abandon the terms coined by left wingers. It is time to tell it like it is.

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Paul T Horgan
Paul T Horgan works in the IT Sector. He lives in Berkshire.

Support Us

Support the Conservative Woman
Click here

Like The Conservative Woman? Donate to help cover our costs

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.