In response to Kathy Gyngell: Bullies back on the baker’s case, Andy Joyce wrote:
This is nothing more than an attack on the Christian/Judeo principles that western culture is based on and which ‘progressives’ despise.
The Supreme Court didn’t actually vindicate the baker regarding freedom of choice; in simple terms, this narrow decision said that the ‘claimant’s’ approach could have been carried out in a more civilised manner, therefore he ruled in favour of the baker.
This story will run and run, the left see this as a test case whereby they can use it as a precedent to force their collectivism on privately owned businesses, like they’ve done to the public sector.
