Friday, October 23, 2020
Home News Reader’s Comment of the Day: Animals beat us at parenting

Reader’s Comment of the Day: Animals beat us at parenting

-

In response to Pippa Jones: We should be reducing the abortion time limit, not extending it, Phil R wrote:

The justification of abortion has never depended upon a consistent definition of human life. It depends upon a consistent understanding of human autonomy. Life after all is a continuum. Any boundary between life and some hypothetical condition of ‘non-life’ is therefore going to be arbitrary by definition. A boundary set at 24 weeks is arbitrary. A boundary set at first breath is likewise arbitrary. Nothing occurs at either boundary to establish some ontological change that moves the child from non-person to person.

The boundary instead facilitates the autonomous choice of the adult. It is a legal boundary only. Before this date, the adult may set aside the obligations of parenthood. If such a legal boundary is not put in place, then parenthood becomes an imposed obligation of sex, and this is what so offends the autonomy of adults. “Why should I be responsible for a kid just because I have sex?”

Animals know how to care for their young. But we kill them lest we have to share our time and money with them.

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.


Follow us!

Share this post