In response to, David Keighley: BBC apologises shock. But only to a climate change fanatic, GnosticBrianwrote:
“The Science is settled” – as was the case with the Aristotelian world view; the Earth is flat; Phlogiston; the promordial aether; Newtonian mechanics… or any number of long discredited theories? Experience teached us that the science is never settled; our current understanding is subject to future revision in the light of new experimental evidence.
Can any of the global warmists explain to me how they are able to make accurate predictions of the future behaviour of a system that is governed by non-linear, chaotic equations?
- Advertisement -
If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.