Sunday, October 25, 2020
Home News Reader’s Comment of the Day: Modern art is rootless and lacks originality

Reader’s Comment of the Day: Modern art is rootless and lacks originality

-

In response to, Luke O’Sullivan: Cultural conservatives have lost their way. That is why their art forms are weak, PerplexedSardine wrote:

There is an echo in this article of what Roger Scruton has been saying for many years: That aesthetics prior to the 20th century built upon what had come before, which (counter-intuitively to a modern artist) resulted in more truly “original” work. It celebrated history, tradition, religion and beauty.

In modern art, the highest praise is not that something is beautiful but only that it is original, “transgressive” being the current popular description. Modern art thus ends up floating free of any established understanding of beauty and becomes whatever fever dream the artist can produce. Oddly enough, this leads to most “transgressive” art looking alike. In Scruton’s own words, we have been producing Duchamp’s urinal ever since. I’d recommend Scruton to interested aesthetes.

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.


Follow us!

Share this post