In response to Ralph Baldwin: Labour’s stalwarts are too busy hating Brexiteers to topple Corbyn, Peter Evans wrote:

I take the point about the spineless unwillingness in the Labour Party to challenge Corbyn’s brownshirts, but it seems to me that Ralph Baldwin makes a serious error of judgement. He appears to be labouring under the rather benevolent illusion that Blairites are cuddly, soft-hearted moderates, when it seems to me that nothing could be further from the truth.

The last time I voted Labour was in 1997, but as soon as I began to see what the Blair creature was up to with his immensely destructive diversity agenda and his stuffing of the statute book with thousands of petty laws crafted by feminist lawyers to make it easier to lock up as many of his fellow citizens as possible, I abandoned Labour for good. Since the post-Cameron Tory Party is the continuation of Blairism, it isn’t an option either.

Here’s an idea: if you want to prevent the rise of sinister forces like the British National Party, maybe it’s best not to subject indigenous working-class communities to a mass influx of immigrants who not only don’t share their language and their customs, but are at least resistant, and often belligerently opposed, to integrating with either.

Imposed, top-down diversity promotes the very ethnic conflicts it pretends to be the solution for. Like terminal junkies hooked on addictive substances, the greater the resulting conflict, the more the Blairite diversocrats prescribe it as the remedy.

And for them, it’s win-win: the more conflict and enmity it inculcates, the more it claims that the country is afflicted by pervasive, shore-to-shore racism, so that ‘protected groups’ need more publicly funded grants to set up organisations to counter it, more affirmative action, more absurd ‘hate crime’ laws to stifle all opposition to the deliberate flooding of an Anglophone European culture with not only non-European, but all too often anti-European traditions.

People of modest means don’t like seeing their communities forcibly changed out of all recognition, their services driven to breaking point, their children unable to find homes for themselves until they’re virtually middle-aged, and, worst of all, the repayment of indigenous hospitality with atrocity after atrocity.

Corbyn is a Marxist-Leninist twerp who thinks that the mass-murdering Mao had some cool ideas. Blairism doesn’t subscribe to this version of Marxism; but it’s founded on Marxism all the same. It’s post-Gramscian Marxism, and ‘diversity’ is its weapon of subversion, not barricades in the streets and soldiers’ revolts.

Max Horkheimer expressed the goal very clearly after he’d fled the Germany of the Third Reich for the safety and hospitality of the USA, where he helped set up (with his fellow Frankfurt School refugees) the cultural Marxist primary tumour at Columbia University. He wrote:

‘The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.’

Horkheimer was, in statements like this, publicly declaring his desire to subvert an established society – the USA – that had given him welcome and refuge from National Socialist terror.

For cultural Marxists, ‘diversity’ IS ‘egalitarianism’, and egalitarianism isn’t equal rights but equal outcomes. Telling people that the reason they haven’t landed a place at Cambridge, or that they haven’t been successful in their job application for a prestigious role because they’ve been oppressed and victimised by racism, breeds hatred and vengefulness. The truth – insufficient ability, experience and/or qualifications – would be far kinder and less destructive.

In successfully promoting this pernicious bosh, the Blairites were every bit as much ruthless ideologues as the bearded Leninist who now heads the party. The same oppressor-oppressed lie resides at the core of both belief systems, only the Blairites were more effective at bringing it into being by seizing control of cultural institutions, just as Horkheimer proposed. They’ve converted the ‘diverse (i.e. the non-white plus their white ‘allies’) into ‘progressives’ who want the civilisation they benefit from to fall.

As the old saying goes: ‘To make a conservative angry, tell him a lie. To make a “progressive” angry, tell the truth.’