In response to Laura Perrins: Meghan: The daughter-in-law from hell
cambridgeelephant wrote:
Well, now he – ‘they – have gone, the advantage is that we might hear a whole lot less of them for the time being. I am sick to death of her ‘woke’ sufferings and me-centric persona.
Our gain is Canada’s loss. But they are, I’m sure, big enough to absorb them. The real problem will come when they hook up with Disney and start plastering themselves all over the ‘entertainment news’.
Whatever the faults of the Duke of Windsor, he did not spend 50 years as an ersatz Mickey Mouse.
Puffoon wrote:
Great article, but I suspect that Harry was always rather more sensitive than his public persona suggested and I think it’s less a case of Sparkles manipulating Harry than Harry willingly submitting to manipulation. From now on, anyone who wants to judge Harry will have to go through Sparkles first – he’s found himself in a nice warm bosom.
RationalSpeculation wrote:
Can’t help but feel (hope?) that this ends with them selling Sussex Royal branded yoga mats at 3am on some small-town American shopping channel.
