Friday, July 30, 2021
HomeCOVID-19Scientists warn of ‘premature and reckless’ vaccine rollout

Scientists warn of ‘premature and reckless’ vaccine rollout

-

AN open letter by scientists and doctors asking urgent safety questions about Covid-19 vaccines sent on 28th February to the European Medicines Agency, setting out in worrying detail what they say are the dangers of continuing with the inoculation programme, has not received the attention it deserves.

It warns of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke and internal bleeding and highlights side-effects in previously healthy younger people.  

They fear the approval of the experimental gene-based vaccines by the European Medicines Agency was ‘premature and reckless’ and say that unless there is evidence that they were safely developed, they should be withdrawn. And they demand evidence that there was in fact a global emergency by the time the vaccines were approved.

Adverse reaction data reported in recent days to the AstraZeneca vaccine of severe cerebral venous thrombosis reveals the group affected – young women between 20 and 50 who are at almost zero risk from COVID, underlining the very real concerns expressed in their letter.

The 12 signatories, who come from the UK, Austria, Sweden, Germany, Canada, Australia and Thailand, sent the letter to Emer Cooke, executive director of the EMA. It was copied to Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. It reads: 

As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics. 

We note that a wide range of side-effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based Covid-19 vaccines.  

Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by Covid-19 within days of vaccination of residents.  

While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortem examinations. 

In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency. 

As a matter of great urgency, we herewith request that the EMA provide us with responses to the following issues: 

1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC 1 pathway at the luminal surface of the cells.  

Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognise such peptides, which may be due to prior Covid infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of coronavirus.  

We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart.  

Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals. 

We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA. 

7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated.  

Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting conditional marketing authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency. 

Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA. 

There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the Covid-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code. 

In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public. 

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

The Conservative Woman
Edited by Kathy Gyngell

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.