ADAM Finn, professor of paediatrics at Bristol University and a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), told BBC Breakfast on Sunday that vaccinating teenagers would ‘minimise the chance of disruption to education, which is really the major harm that the pandemic has done to our children’. This, as 800 schools prepare for visits this week from health teams intent on needling as many 12-to-15-year-olds as possible against a virus of no threat to them, and against which the majority of whom will now enjoy robust immunity.
Professor Finn also said that the school rollout would increase the overall levels of immunity in the population, helping to reduce the spread of the virus, in yet another complete dismissal of the vaccine’s inability to prevent transmission. This is amply evidenced by the vaccine surveillance reports issued by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) which clearly show all double-jabbed adult cohorts to be experiencing the double jeopardy of an epidemic of re-infection within the pandemic tyranny of a nevertheless fake emergency.
He also failed to address the UKHSA’s Green Book of vaccines and vaccination protocol, updated on October 29, which still clearly states that children are ‘unlikely to be key drivers of transmission at a population level’.
Quite aside from the fact that the corruptible pushover of a body to which he belongs advised in August that, paradoxically, a school rollout would itself be unjustifiably disruptive to education, as would be the inevitable time pupils would spend absent due to adverse vaccine reactions (though not injuries or fatalities, of course), it is obscene that Professor Finn now has the temerity to say school disruption is ‘the major harm that the pandemic has done to our children’ while simultaneously condoning the implementation of the rollout on school premises.
As a supposed vaccine expert Professor Finn must surely know that the pandemic has not ‘done’ anything to children: no healthy child has died from Covid-19 in England. The misery heaped upon our juvenile population is that which Government has chosen to heap upon them, and I dare say simply to service the belief that a universal health pass cannot be fully implemented unless all, regardless of age, are bullied on to ‘the system’; Finn continuing that ‘the UK and EU were likely to follow suit’ in recommending the rollout to five-to-11-year-olds, as have the US Food and Drug Administration.
Shockingly for a paediatrician, Professor Finn has expressed little concern about the cruelty and recklessness of Government’s Covid-19 response to children, and has clearly become yet another healthcare-puppet whose mouth is being stuffed with the unmerited power afforded him by those choreographing his bleak and corrupted moral outlook.
Ignoring for a moment the experimental nature of this ‘gene therapy’ and the trail of injury in its wake, what about the developmental harm wreaked on our young through denial of access to their friends during multiple alienating lockdowns, patently and provenly ineffective, which compromised their natural immunity? What about the many harms to confidence, identity and mental wellbeing of having to continuously wear masks, a counter-measure never even recommended in the first place? What about the developmental harm to infants of not seeing their mothers’ smiles, staring wide-eyed out into the world at a sea of faceless beings?
What about the ‘fear of other’ that social-distancing protocols have engendered, Professor Finn? The sense of being a pathogenic threat to one’s peers or to one’s grandmother, or the fear of causing the death of a loved one?
What about hypochondriacal, abusive, harmful and ultimately useless testing protocols in schools that eradicate precious opportunities for personal growth by persuading children that any level of risk in life is unacceptable, a ridiculous denial of the fundamental nature of life itself?
What about all the children currently parked in the NHS backlog awaiting diagnosis let alone treatment for genuine illness, the least affected being forced to pay the heaviest costs of this ‘pandemic’ of yours and your esteemed colleagues, as you all hide out in the safety of university faculties up and down the country from which you deliver your sermons of gloom to the rest of us?
Why, Professor, are you now so bent on vaccinating all children when only last week you told Sky News that vaccines are ‘not by themselves going to be enough at the present time to keep the spread of the virus under control’? If children are not even key drivers of transmission, why do you now deem it necessary to vaccinate them all? What has radically changed from the time of your original decision in August and now? Whose influence are you folding under?
You also said that we shan’t be able to avoid further lockdowns ‘if we all just go back to normal now’, choosing to ignore that normality – the development of healthy immunity – IS the vaccine, Professor. Why are you so determined to restrict children’s normal life and so continue to compromise their health and ability to deal with any challenge, medical or social?
I don’t for a second believe that your own heart is fully committed to the words tumbling out of your mouth. Like Hancock, Javid, Zahawi and Whitty, your forked tongue has begun tasting its air, and in so doing is erasing your better self and betraying the antithesis of a good paediatrician.