TCW
Sunday, July 21, 2024
TCW
HomeCOVID-19Sign this petition if you want the negligent MHRA brought to account...

Sign this petition if you want the negligent MHRA brought to account on Covid vaccines

-

ALEX Hicks, who can be found on Twitter here, has launched a petition demanding a public inquiry into the approval process for the Covid-19 vaccines. You can see it here. 

I have just signed it. I would ask you to consider signing it too. Well done to him for taking this initiative, which is well overdue. TCW has been tracking the inadequacy and negligence of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the body responsible for approving the vaccines, for nearly two years. The emergency authorisation for Covid vaccine first granted in December 2020 was premature. Now, full regulatory approval has been granted for the Pfizer vaccine despite the ongoing and cumulative high levels of vaccine injuries. Far from pulling back, Dr June Raine, the CEO of the MHRA, is going full steam ahead on vaccine approvals, the latest being babies and children aged six months to four years, ignoring doctors’ urgent warnings.

You can find 16 pages of TCW‘s coverage of the MHRA here,  and this is still not the complete record. Last summer we reported Dr Raine’s self-declared enthusiasm for novel mRNA vaccines and her decision, in her own words, to change her regulatory authority from watchdog to enabler.

Together these reports add up to an alarming account of hubris, negligence and lack of accountability – of the precautionary principle thrown to the winds. 

Alex Hicks’s petition is correctly quite specific. He wants the inquiry to consider ‘all aspects of the approval process, including how approval was expedited and the drivers for expedition, and any potential conflicts of interests’. 

He notes that the MHRA are primarily funded by fees from the pharmaceutical industry and that an expedited rolling review was used to grant temporary authorisations for the use of Covid-19 vaccines. He points out that the initial Covid-19 vaccines were approved based on efficacy in reducing illness from Covid-19, whereas bivalent boosters have been approved based on immune response, and that the Moderna Bivalent booster has been approved despite lower efficacy than the original vaccine, and Pfizer BA.4-5 booster was approved using BA.1 data. Finally he reports that ‘Public Assessment Reports’ for bivalent boosters have been published months after the boosters were approved.

Please do sign this if you want to see the irresponsible MHRA brought to account – here is the link once again. 

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngellhttps://www.conservativewoman.co.uk
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.