Tuesday, April 16, 2024
HomeCOVID-19Study of 100million confirms risk of vaccine damage, yet still the MSM...

Study of 100million confirms risk of vaccine damage, yet still the MSM play it down


A NEW covid vaccination study made some mainstream headlines this week – thanks to its size. Bloomberg carefully reported it as ‘the largest covid vaccine study yet finds links to health conditions’, while the Mail‘s headline read: ‘Largest Covid vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological, blood and heart disorders – but they are still extremely rare.’ Note the ‘small’ and the ‘rare’.

So that’s all right then? What does ‘small’ or ‘rare’ mean, I wonder, for people who have suffered and nearly died from Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS), an ‘adverse event’ highlighted in the Mail’s article, as did Tony Shingler reported on here by Sally Beck? (Transverse myelitis – Tony’s initial diagnosis – which is a closely associated inflammatory disorder characterised by acute or subacute motor, sensory, and autonomic spinal cord dysfunction – had resulted in temporary pausing of the AstraZeneca trial, an association the drug firm of course denied.)

What does it mean for the 295 individuals with GBS identified after Covid-19 vaccination verified in this February 2023 study of US VAERS data, 275 reports (93.2 per cent) of which documented hospitalisation?

What does it mean for the 67 GBS cases recorded between 2020 and 2021 in the UK? (See this BMJ research article published in 2022.) Surely these cases were enough to raise a red flag? People have been crippled and left suicidal. Can someone at GB News put this article we published in front of Rishi Sunak?

While on one level we must be grateful for this now indisputable official confirmation giving the lie to the ‘safe’ claim, the guilty legacy media are still playing it down.

That they never bothered to scrutinise or analyse the published Yellow Card reports will remain an indictment. Take for example this breakdown of post-covid-vaccine Nervous System Disorder adverse events alone from our TCW Yellow Card report analysis of last October. How many did we find? Just a cool 300,973 ‘events’. This is a huge number. For the following subcategories we found:     

  • 4,151 Seizures – 1,356 (Pfizer-mono) + 36 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 2,329 (AZ) + 339 (Moderna-mono) + 44 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Novavax) + 46 (Unknown)
  • 1,700 Paralysis & Paresis – 559 (Pfizer-mono) + 22 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 935 (AZ) + 152 (Moderna-mono) + 15 (Moderna-bivalent) + 17 (Unknown)
  • 13,491 Tremor – 2,331 (Pfizer-mono) + 82 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 10,048 (AZ) + 843 (Moderna-mono) + 117 (Moderna-bivalent) + 70 (Unknown)

How can anyone think this is acceptable? And Yellow Card data is acknowledged to be underreported. Vaccination should not be a game of Russian roulette.

Returning to the study of 100million funded by the US Centers for Disease Control, the Epoch Times (which unlike the rest of the MSM has consistently reported adverse events and calls to ban the vaccines, including articles first published here) provides by far the best summary:  

‘A multinational study of over 99million vaccinated people has identified higher incidences of neurological, cardiovascular, and blood disorder complications than the researchers expected. The peer-reviewed observational cohort study, published in the Vaccine journal on February 12, aimed to evaluate the risk of 13 adverse events of special interest (AESI) following Covid-19 vaccination. The AESIs spanned three categories – neurological, hematologic (blood), and cardiovascular. It reviewed data collected from more than 99million vaccinated people from eight nations – Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand and Scotland – looking at risks up to 42 days after getting the shots. The study looked at three vaccines – Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines as well as AstraZeneca’s viral vector jab.

‘Researchers found higher than expected cases that they deemed met the threshold to be potential safety signals for multiple AESIs, including for Guillain-Barré syndrome, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), myocarditis and pericarditis. A safety signal refers to information that could suggest a potential risk or harm that may be associated with a medical product.’

Naveen Athrappully’s excellent article goes on to describe in detail the various adverse events and disorders listed from GBS (a statistically significant increase was observed after the first AstraZeneca shot). The researchers had expected 76 GBS events in the observational cohort study but ended up identifying 190. They found acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) which causes inflammation of the central nervous system; Bell’s palsy; CVST is a condition in which blood clots form in the brain, blocking the blood from draining out. This can cause a brain haemorrhage. While 21 events were expected, researchers identified more than three times the number of cases at 69 following the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine. CVST cases were also higher than expected after the first and second Pfizer shots; myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle and pericarditis is an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. ‘The number of pericarditis cases exceeded expectations following all doses of all the three vaccines.’

You can read the rest of Epoch Times article here. 

Some final words on the actual research report which you can find here. For some reason it concentrates on the 20-60 age groups. While it acknowledges the possibility of under-reporting (undoubtedly the case) what it fails to point out is that the entire enterprise was unbelievably reckless, injuring thousands if not millions with the full health consequences not yet known – and as unnecessary as it was ineffective.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Kathy Gyngell
Kathy Gyngell
Kathy is Editor of The Conservative Woman. She is @kathygyngelltcw on GETTR and is back on Twitter.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.