Sunday, April 14, 2024
HomeNewsTaking electricity to Africa is good for us all

Taking electricity to Africa is good for us all


THE Global Policy Warming Foundation has just launched a programme called Energy Justice.  Its purpose is to raise awareness of the severe energy poverty that afflicts the developing world as well as of studied attempts by Western institutions to foist expensive and unreliable renewables on the poorest people, who simply cannot afford it.

It began on Monday with Energy For Africa Week. The first paper commissioned as part of the project attempts to put a human face on the question of energy access. Entitled ‘Heart of Darkness: Why energy poverty is a security issue’, it is a deeply personal view of the problems of energy access in sub-Saharan Africa by journalist Geoff Hill which we are publishing in five parts, beginning today.

You could have knocked me over with a candle. It was October 2017 and I was with a group of journalists quizzing US energy secretary Rick Perry on his first visit to Cape Town, when someone asked why Washington was spending billions on electricity plants in Africa. I expected a politician’s answer: human rights, good work, a policy that cares about the less fortunate.

‘It’s a security issue,’ he said. ‘Militia and terror groups are a magnet for young men without jobs, and if there’s no grid or power, you can’t industrialise.’ He rolled off the numbers. More than 600million Africans – half the population – are not on the grid. America uses more electricity in a day than Ghana or Tanzania generate in a year. Investors are keen on the continent, but a lack of capacity keeps them away.

Perry comes across as someone who understands how tough life can be for some Americans and how much harder it is in the developing world. He hasn’t always been a politician; he has a grasp of the world outside Washington. In his youth he worked in many roles, including as a door-to-door salesman. He served in the US Air Force, rising to the rank of captain and flying humanitarian missions to Africa and Central America. And he holds the record as the longest serving governor of Texas where, he says, he was exposed to ‘the anguish of unemployment and the hopelessness people feel when they can’t get a job’.

The border between Mexico and the US is nearly 2,000 miles long, and two-thirds of it lies in Texas. As governor, Perry took a special interest in immigration. The number of illegal crossings fell during his 12 years in office, but he insisted that poverty, poor governance and unemployment is what drove people to seek a better life.

‘I see the same problem when young people trek hundreds of miles through the Sahara to try crossing the Mediterranean into Europe,’ he said. ‘Thousands have drowned, others made it, but many are deported. I don’t believe we should vilify these exiles, but the answer also doesn’t lie in moving them somewhere else. Rather, we need to make their countries of origin a better place to live.’ These, he said, were issues of conscience. Good things to do.
‘They’re what American aid and foreign policy is about: making a better world.’ I sensed a ‘but’ coming on: ‘But I and the administration, along with Congress, we represent the American people. So while we’re helping Africa, there has to be something for the taxpayers because it’s their money. Bringing real levels of power to Africa, the kind we take for granted at home, is good for America because it helps us end the scourge of terror. It cuts illegal migration and it makes economies stronger, so they have the buying power to trade with the US and boost American jobs.’

After nearly four decades of reporting on Africa, I have heard a lot about aid, usually from two perspectives. The first says it’s some kind of moral responsibility for rich countries to help the poor, and I get that. The second points to billions spent across half a century with little to show. So Perry made sense to me. Widening access to electricity wasn’t America’s duty or Africa’s right. It was money on the ground with potential for both sides to reap a profit.

Left or Right, from Donald Trump to French President Emmanuel Macron or Sweden’s Stefan Löfven, there’s agreement that Africa has a problem with jobs. From a poor city such as Dar es Salaam in Tanzania to Africa’s richest shopping zone at Sandton in Johannesburg with the likes of Chanel and Gucci plying their trade, there are young people out of work, or serving tables in spite of having good grades for English and algebra.

When it comes to unemployment, numbers are hard to find, and not because the state doesn’t come up with them. The UN, World Bank, and most national governments have detailed charts on the workforce. In South Africa, for example, the figure depends on whether you count part-time jobs, subsistence agriculture and those not looking for work. Pretoria puts the jobless rate at around 25 per cent, most of them urban.
However, when polling companies ask, ‘Do you have a job?’ more than double that number say ‘No’. The difference lies in what’s known as the informal sector. Across cities and towns, you’ll see people from their mid-teens to middle age sharpening knives or fixing tyres and exhausts along the roadside. Others stand at traffic lights, holding fruit or a tangle of phone chargers. Officially, they have jobs but, when polled, most say the opposite. Vending, they say, is a way to pay the rent while looking for work.

South Africa is the continent’s richest nation, with a GDP of close on $400billion, so what chance for the Central African Republic, whose total economy is less than 2 per cent of that? Nothing will change there without access to electricity; according to the World Bank, close to nine out of ten are not on the grid. In many places, it’s about what engineers call ‘the last half mile’. Electricity is there, but minus the lines connecting it to homes. With rapid urbanisation, slums and squatter camps spring up around cities. People use paraffin stoves or make illegal connections to a pylon, resulting in the so-called shack fires that kill thousands every year.

Rick Perry’s speech made headlines. I wrote a front-page story for the Washington Times and, after the press event, he held meetings with African energy ministers to set his plan in place. But he had one more rider. ‘When people don’t have electricity, they don’t care where it comes from,’ he said. ‘In Texas, we’ve done wonders with wind power, and Africa has potential there, and especially for solar. But on a continent rich in gas and coal, countries must have a right to use their own resources.’ America, he said, was there to help, ‘not to dictate.’ He closed as he’d begun. This was a security issue, reducing the pull of al-Shabaab, Boko Haram and the human traffickers. Bringing jobs and industry to a continent out of work.

‘More than anything, our power project is there to give people hope,’ he said. ‘Because, make no mistake, if we don’t, someone else will.’

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Geoff Hill
Geoff Hill
Geoff Hill is a Zimbabwean writer working across Africa. Formerly special reports manager for Rupert Murdoch's flagship paper, the Australian, first non-American to win a John Steinbeck Award and author of the bestselling The Battle for Zimbabwe. A life-long conservationist, he has written extensively about the environment.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.