I’VE tried to step back from reporting on Covid, but just can’t. It is becoming too obvious that our leaders are in denial about the ineffectiveness of the experimental vaccine they are pushing, the harm it is causing and the potential for harm that lies ahead. This isn’t a time for statistical games. This is a matter of life and death.
The madness keeps getting worse. The Government is putting children’s lives and health at unnecessary risk by driving them into being vaccinated, even though they have high levels of natural immunity to the virus.
This is despite a growing body of evidence that the vaccine impedes the development of natural immunity, and may make those who receive it more vulnerable to virus variants than the unvaccinated.
Could this be why several countries, including the UK, are experiencing higher rates of infection in vaccinated people than in the unvaccinated?
When the newly formed UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) – perhaps not yet fully integrated into the official propaganda machine – published data to this effect (now removed!) it found itself lambasted in the press, which has for the most part blindly supported the vaccine drive from the start. Cambridge statistician David Spiegelhalter was reported as complaining that the data was ‘simply an artefact’ due to inappropriate population estimates, but was ‘material for conspiracy theorists around the world’.
The agency itself warned that the figures could easily be misinterpreted, because of differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. But as the indefatigable analyst Dr Will Jones pointed out, if there are biases that need adjusting, we should do that rather than smear those who raise the questions.
The mechanism through which the jab itself may be contributing to higher SARS-CoV-2 infections has to do with a phenomenon spelled out in this post by ‘Eugyppius’, an expert commentator based in Germany, as well as in this TrialSiteNews article published last week.
It is known as ‘Original Antigenic Sin’, or OAS. It means in a nutshell that the first time we are exposed to a disease agent, such as a virus, the response of the body’s immune system shapes how we deal with modified forms of the same pathogen – such as virus variants – when we meet them later.
With Covid, the vaccines we have seen so far target a single part of the virus, the famous spike protein. That is in sharp contrast to what happens when we meet the virus naturally. In the latter case, the infection provokes production of antibodies against a range of virus proteins, including the spike but also one called the nucleocapsid or N-protein. This plays a key role in the virus’s life cycle. So, people who mount a successful immune response to the infection subsequently enjoy much better protection than the merely vaccinated.
The problem goes still deeper: when those who have had the jab are exposed to the natural infection, their antibodies focus on the spike protein with which they were originally inoculated. If that has changed in the meantime, it becomes much easier for the virus to bypass the immune defences – ‘potentially for good, and in billions of people’, as Eugyppius gloomily comments.
His speculation is supported by a recent Journal of Infection article finding just that kind of mechanism at work. People who receive a vaccine based on the spike protein of the original Wuhan virus produce antibodies which limit protection, and even enhance infection, when they are exposed to the Delta strain.
To assess how many people have developed natural infection, public health experts in England have been measuring Covid antibodies in blood donors. Immunity towards the N-protein has been rising very slowly, and is especially low – around 5-15 per cent – in the most heavily vaccinated age groups. In contrast, antibodies to the spike protein – elicited both by vaccines and infection – have reached 96 per cent.
‘If our vaccines were pre-programming the immune response to focus only on the spike protein, this is what that would look like,’ Eugyppius says.
The UKHSA clearly states that recent surveillance data show the N antibody levels ‘appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination’.
Eygyppius comments: ‘Thus the report authors are compelled to admit that prior vaccination inhibits anti-N antibodies’ – that is, the most protective antibody response.
He goes on: ‘The universal vaccination campaign has coincided with a marked increase in the volatility of corona and vast changes to regional and temporal patterns of infection. For the first time, SARS-2 has departed from the seasonality observed by other human coronaviruses. Official discourse has laid all of this at the feet of the Delta variant, but it is very doubtful even the scientists and bureaucrats responsible for this line really believe it.
‘Mass vaccination has drastically altered the environment in which SARS-2 circulates. This was always expected to change the behaviour of the virus – just not in this precise way. In return for only limited protection against severe outcomes, the vaccines appear to encourage the spread of SARS-2 in multiple different ways. In continuing to insist on mass vaccination, our public health bureaucrats are doing the bidding of the virus. There is no other way to look at it.’
With infections in the vaccinated continuing to outpace infections in the unvaccinated by ever greater amounts, he writes, ‘it’s just no longer credible to claim that this is a statistical error’.
Eugyppius remains anonymous, probably because of working in academia or medical science, where the climate of opinion is such as to try to silence those who challenge the wisdom of the global vaccination drive.
We know now that short-term protection against Covid, as seen during a few weeks following the jab, does not continue. This is why booster shots are given. With even three jabs proving inadequate, a fourth dose is currently proposed for vulnerable Americans.
The Prime Minister, speaking to reporters on a visit to a Covid vaccination centre, gave us a welcome dose of honesty when he said double vaccination does not protect against catching the disease, or passing it on. He nevertheless insisted that it provides ‘a lot of protection against serious illness and death’.
But is that true? Not according to this report, again from TrialSiteNews. It finds that as of October 10, death rates from Covid are higher, following the vaccine rollouts, in 70 per cent of 178 countries for which data could be obtained. And in the USA and other countries around the world, deaths from all causes are higher than they were in 2020, before the rollouts began.
Leaving aside risks of a mass failure of the vaccine in the longer term through ‘Original Antigenic Sin’, thousands of deaths have been reported globally in the immediate wake of vaccination. That is despite a ‘head-in-the-sand’ attitude over the link among many doctors and hospital authorities, suggesting the actual figures may be a lot higher.
We are repeatedly told that these deaths are mostly among older people, who may have died anyway from unrelated conditions. But regulators have done little to investigate the true causes, even when they reached record-breaking levels such as during the early jab drive in Gibraltar last January.
People who have seen friends or relatives die in front of them often have no doubt about the cause. You may have seen the Testimonies Project, from Israel, featured here at TCW. Please also take a look at this harrowing account, In Loving Memory of Sue. It’s a simple story, told by Sue’s best friend, of how a woman’s body ate itself up in the wake of the jab. And here a ten-year-old tells a public gathering of Stephen, found dead in bed a week after his second dose.
In America, with whom our health officials seem bound in some unholy alliance, children as young as five are now destined to be inoculated. Will our five-year-olds be next? Is there anyone out there with the power to stop this insanity?