Monday, May 20, 2024
HomeLaura PerrinsThe mind-blowing evil of slicing off young girls’ breasts

The mind-blowing evil of slicing off young girls’ breasts


I HAVE written previously about how the child mutilation agenda, sometimes referred to as ‘the transgender movement’ by the mainstream media, has suffered some setbacks. 

Defeating this evil, this movement that exploits the goodwill of people to push lie after lie, is not inevitable. But defeated they must be as we shouldn’t be in any doubt about just how evil the agenda is. 

Some data has been released in the United States that really tests your faith in humanity. The Daily Wire reports: ‘A new study of nationwide hospital databases found that at least 1,130 adolescents between 2016 and 2019 received “gender-affirming” chest surgeries in the US. The study, published in JAMA Paediatrics, saw a 389 per cent increase in adolescents (ages 12-17) obtaining chest surgeries from 2016 to 2019. An overwhelming majority (1,114) of the adolescents seeking this surgery were female (98.6 per cent), and just 16 were male (1.4 per cent).’ 

This is the United States, where the regulation of such ‘surgery’ is minimal. We should be grateful for the fact that such procedures cannot be carried out in the UK on minors, but they can receive dangerous ‘puberty blocking’ drugs under Gillick competence. This was tested in the courts, but ultimately it was held that such powerful drugs, which can cause infertility, may be administered to children in limited circumstances.

The US figures are truly shocking. First, the numbers are underreported, as they do not take into account operations carried out in private settings. Leor Sapir, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, says: ‘Because these procedures yield around $10,000 per patient, many mastectomies take place outside of hospitals in surgery centres owned by plastic surgeons themselves.’

The ages of the girls involved are horrific. The Daily Wire: ‘The paediatric patients ranged from 12 to 17, with 42 (5.5 per cent) of the recipients between 12 and 14, 131 (16 per cent) aged 15, 291 (34.5 per cent) aged 16, and 365 (44 per cent) aged 17.’ This means that in the United States, a supposed civilised first world country, trained doctors are slicing off the breasts of girls aged 12, 13 and 14. Just let that barbarity sink in.

But the numbers are tiny, some might say. First, one is too many. One teenage girl having her breasts cut off by an adult is one too many. Second, these so-called medics, these butchers in white coats, want more victims as this is a very lucrative business. The operations themselves are expensive, and so is the follow-up ‘care’. 

But what I want you to consider is the outright evil necessary to carry out such a procedure. What kind of person, a medic, who has trained to ‘care’ for people, to cure them of illnesses, gets up in the morning, gets ready and drives to their place of work knowing they are going to mutilate a 12-year-old girl? Perhaps they grab a Starbucks and listen to NPR in the car as they get in the zone for their latest ‘procedure’. This is the very definition of the banality of evil. 

What must it take for a surgeon, who could do anything else with the skills they have, to stand over a 12-year-old girl, knife in hand, and prepare to cut off her breasts? This surgeon is an adult. They have the advantage of years of life experience and a very expensive education. They are mature; their victim, however, has been on the planet for only 12, 13, perhaps 14 years. 

This girl is not even close to being physically, mentally or emotionally mature. She may not vote. She may not drink alcohol, she may not drive. She may not even watch most movies. She has no concept at all of long-term risk because her pre-frontal brain is not developed. Yet there the surgeon stands, knife in hand, and cuts her breasts off, breasts that she must have had for only a year or two, and disposes of them in medical waste. The evil is mind-blowing; it is Dr Mengele levels of darkness. 

This hatred of the female form must stop. This is female bodily mutilation, a close cousin of female genital mutilation. Yes, I did compare the two as they are very similar – an attack on the female body with only aesthetic and a clean setting to set them apart. And if we had a clean setting and anaesthetic for female genital mutilation would that make it OK? No. If the teenage girl said she consented to the operation, should society let her do it? No, not a civilised society in any case. 

This transgender agenda must be fought in every single place it rears its head – be it schools or the workplace. It’s no time to ‘go with the flow’. Evil must be fought here and now. 

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.