Monday, November 30, 2020
Home News Thought for today: To have and to hold – or not to?

Thought for today: To have and to hold – or not to?

-

A UNIVERSITY of Exeter study has found that non-Christian couples find it easier to circumvent the prohibition on religious content in civil weddings because presiding officials often fail to recognise the words they are asked to read, the Telegraph reports.

Apparently, phrases from the Book of Common Prayer such as ‘To have and to hold/ for better, for worse’ are routinely weeded out, whereas nearly all registrars would permit the lines ‘I give you this ring as a symbol of unity/ in which our lives are now joined in one unbroken circle’ which is taken from Hindu liturgy.

One can understand the latter reading gaining traction in an age when we increasingly feel that we are going round in circles – especially regarding the supposed Brexit negotiations – but surely ‘having and holding’ would be more appropriate, useful and indeed patriotic?

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Ann Farmer
Ann Farmer is the author of By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control, and the Abortion Movement (Catholic University of America, 2008).

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.


Follow us!

Share this post