Wednesday, October 28, 2020
Home News Tory insider: The fatal drafting error that could cost the Tories the...

Tory insider: The fatal drafting error that could cost the Tories the election

-

This  seems to  have been  a  real howler and could well  be the fatal error which sinks the boat. What went wrong? We have never had an adequate explanation.  Here’s a bash at an one below.

Boundary change was the biggest thing on the Conservative wish list  – and rightly so. And in the all-night session during which the Coalition Agreement was thrashed out, Cameron very reasonably seems to have  traded it for the biggest item on Clegg’s wish list- a vote on changing our electoral system to the alternative vote.

This was a huge gamble. AV (PR lite) could have meant the Conservatives never again getting into power, given that the two socialist parties’ supporters would vote for each other. That is a measure of how important boundary change was to Cameron.

The two measures were therefore very sensibly tied to each other in clause 24, which said that they would both be contained in a single ” Constitutional” Bill.

Clearly, neither side could trust the other to vote for the second measure if two sequential bills were used.

Note that House of Lords reform was not part of this deal.

And what happened!

A single Bill was duly brought forward and voted through.

Phew, so far, so good.

But…….. so far as one can make out,  with a fatal drafting error.

The referendum on AV was unconditional. But boundary change was made conditional upon a further vote once the boundary commission had dealt with the detail. In other words the two measures were separated – Clegg was given  his AV vote but left with the ability to   vote down boundary change  –  if and when something upset him.

Which it later did.

You can’t blame the Lib Dems. That’s like blaming a snake for biting you. It’s what they do. Give the Lib Dems an opportunity to rat on a deal? Of course they will.  Particularly with those cunning old hands, Paddy Ashdown and Shirley Williams behind Clegg.

If this interpretation is correct, What should have been done?

Surely, it would have been perfectly simple to word the Bill so that the AV vote could only take place after boundary change had also become unconditional? Legal agreements are often drafted  so that clauses are interconditional.   The whole  purpose of having the two measures in a single Bill was precisely so they were interconditonal. Or are we missing something here?

The only explanation one hears  is that no one thought Clegg would not vote it through at the second stage (with the implication that  no one focused on the possibility of betrayal  and therefore the  instructions given to the draftsmen to produce something watertight!!)

Is this the real story?  It is difficult  to  understand how this degree of trust could have been placed on Clegg.  After all, there is an old saying  “ when dealing with s**t, have paper in hand ! “

But ultimately, surely,  Cameron  should have picked up the point.  Margaret  Thatcher would have read the Bill and got someone out of bed when she saw the error. Wouldn’t she? What about the Cabinet Secretary? Aren’t  they supposed to  pick up these things?

One  can only imagine Cameron’s sinking  feeling when he realised. Like finding your  broker put all your money with Lehman Brothers!  It’s amazing he was even able to sit in the same room as Clegg afterwards,  if this really is the story.

But this is twenty  seats  to  Labour straight off the top of the pack – maybe more depending upon how the Ukip cards fall

Oh dear, oh dear! One wonders who got the blame!

If anyone has another, less appalling  explanation- lets hear it!

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.


Follow us!

Share this post