ON Tuesday the US Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) recommended something called the ‘pediatric’ Covid-19 vaccine for children, giving the green light to injecting some 28million children between 5 and 11 years of age.
You can read Lifesite News‘s full report here.
Extraordinarily, during the FDA advisory hearing Dr Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, though expressing ‘the concern of many members about possible severe side effects that cannot yet be measured’, concluded that there was no other way forward, saying: ‘We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.’
How any reputable scientist can believe that 28million guinea pigs are necessary for this unnecessary ‘trial’ simply beggars belief.
It is high time all decent adults arose en masse against this evil enterprise. For those who need convincing that there was never more call to ‘suffer little children’ the safety they deserve, Rebecca Weisser sets out the irrefutable case against vaccinating children. In tbis week’s Australian Spectator she writes:
‘ . . . for no group does the risk of Covid look slighter than for little children. In the US, for those aged 5-11, there have been 1.8million cases and only 138 Covid-related deaths. That’s a case fatality rate of 0.007 per cent. As with older people, those at greatest risk of severe Covid and deaths are children with underlying medical conditions, such as asthma, diabetes and obesity, who made up two-thirds of severe Covid cases. There were 8,622 hospitalisations, or 0.5 per cent of cases. Both statistics overstate the risk as so many children who are infected are asymptomatic and not tested.
‘A threat so much smaller than flu poses could not, in a rational world, justify the approval of an experimental drug, with zero long-term safety data, for a segment of the population with so little susceptibility to anything other than Covid sniffles. It would only be considered for those at risk.’
She details mendacious way the ‘safety’ data was presented:
‘Pfizer seems to have used this “technique”’ of selectively presenting safety data to avoid mentioning a child who was seriously injured in its trials on 12-15-year-olds; Maddie de Garay was a healthy 13-year-old until her second Pfizer shot left her crippled by neurological disorders. She had to be fed through a tube and was confined to a wheelchair.
‘In the current trial, children experienced fever, chills, headaches, vomiting and muscle pain but Pfizer claims that all serious events were unrelated to the vaccine. Nonetheless, adverse events — mild, moderate and severe — occurred more frequently in the vaccine group including psychiatric disorders, blood and lymphatic disorders, skin and subcutaneous disorders including Henoch-Schönlein purpura (inflammation of the blood vessels), immune system disorders, gastro-intestinal bleeding, severe fever and severe decline in neutrophils which fight bacterial infection and is normally caused by chemotherapy, autoimmune diseases and or vitamin and mineral deficiencies.’
Weisser also trounces Pfizer’s argument that children should be vaccinated to prevent Sars-CoV-2 transmission:
‘This is absurd. As in its trials with older people, it didn’t test participants for asymptomatic infection, presumably because the data would not help its case.’
The facts are otherwise: ‘Far from representing a dangerous reservoir of the virus, studies have shown that children are more likely to be infected by adults than to infect them. In addition, at least 17 studies have also shown that infection-acquired immunity is more enduring and robust than ephemeral vaccine-acquired immunity including a study out this week from Yale which estimated that it lasts at least three times longer.’
You can read this excellent article here.
Pfizer execs and their collaborating scientists and government doctors would be hanging their heads in shame and begging for mercy if there were any justice in this world. They must not be allowed to get away with it here.