Sunday, May 19, 2024
HomeNewsWhat the Left won’t tell you about Marie Stopes

What the Left won’t tell you about Marie Stopes


FOR some, the name Marie Stopes speaks of a feminist icon and pioneer for birth control and family planning.For others, it speaks of one of the biggest abortion providers in the world.

Both are true, but few know about Marie Stopes the woman, the author, palaeobotanist, family planning pioneer and eugenicist. It is the woman that I focus on here because she is key to understanding the Marie Stopes organisation of today.

Marie Stopes is widely lauded. The BBC history page dedicated to her describes her as a ‘campaigner for women’s rights and a pioneer in the field of family planning’ and says nothing negative about her. A biography on the Manchester University website describes her as ‘truly an extraordinary woman. Despite the hardships she had faced from her opponents, she continued to pursue the causes she believed in, and remains to this day as a much loved and respected figure. In honour of her name the charity Marie Stopes International [was] established in the 1970s.’ Readers of the Guardian voted Stopes as Woman of the Millennium in 1999. In 2008 she was chosen by an all-female, all-feminist committee to be one of six pioneering women in a Royal Mail commemorative stamp series.

The organisation named after her, Marie Stopes International (MSI), is clearly proud of its link to her, its website making clear that its present work is built on her legacy:

‘The way we provide contraception and safe abortion services has been shaped, to a large extent, by our history. And by the lives of two pioneers of the family planning movement, Dr Marie Stopes and Dr Tim Black. Both built reputations for their client-centred approach and their willingness to push boundaries – qualities that are central to how we work today.’

However, the MSI website, the BBC Stopes page and many other biographies omit a great deal of interesting information. In particular, her openly racist and eugenic beliefs and practices have been largely ignored or, at best, framed as an embarrassing footnote to her achievements.

Here are some lesser-known facts about Marie Stopes and her beliefs:

1. From 1918 to the early 1930s she published several books on marriage and birth control. One of these was Radiant Motherhood (1920). In a chapter headed ‘A new and irradiated race’ Stopes reveals her underlying (and repulsive) agenda behind her push for widespread birth control: ‘It is the urgent duty of the community to make parenthood impossible for those whose mental and physical conditions are such that there is a certainty that their offspring must be physically and mentally tainted.’ She wants their sterilisation made immediate and compulsory, otherwise there will be an ‘ever increasing stock of degenerate, feeble-minded and unbalanced who will devastate social customs . . . like the parasite upon a healthy tree.’

2. She did not just write, but actively lobbied the Prime Minister and Parliament to pass Acts to enforce compulsory sterilisation in order to ‘ensure the sterility of the hopelessly rotten and racially diseased . . . by the elimination of wasteful lives.’

3. Stopes also urged the National Birth Rate Commission to support the compulsory sterilisation of certain parents. To use her words, these included ‘hopelessly bad cases, bad through inherent disease, or drunkenness or character’, ‘wastrels, the diseased’, ‘the miserable [and] the criminal’, ‘degenerate, feeble-minded and unbalanced’, ’parasites’ and the ‘insane’. In Wise Parenthood she explains: ‘Our race is weakened by an appallingly high percentage of unfit weaklings and diseased individuals.’

4. Marie Stopes’s first family planning clinic was in North London in 1921 and was run by an organisation she founded: The Society for Constructive Birth Control and Racial Progress. It was no coincidence that her birth control clinics were clustered in deprived areas, to focus on reducing the birth rate of the poor lower classes and prevent the birth of those whom she considered to be ‘the inferior, the depraved, and the feeble-minded’.

5. Her views were not a passing fad. In 1934 she publicly stated that all ‘half-castes’ should be sterilised at birth. In 1956, two years before she died, she asserted that one-third of British men should be forcibly sterilised, ‘starting with the ugly and unfit’.

6. Stopes cut her own son out of her will simply because he married a girl who wore glasses. Instead the bulk of her estate went to the Eugenics Society.

7. Stopes was a Nazi supporter. In 1935, she attended a Nazi Congress for Population Science in Berlin. Four years later she sent Hitler a gushing personal letter along with a volume of her love poems: ‘Dear Herr Hitler, love is the greatest thing in the world: so will you accept from me these that you may allow the young people of your nation to have them?‘ A poem of hers from 1942, at the height of the Jewish Holocaust, has this to say: ‘Catholics and Prussians, The Jews and the Russians, All are a curse, Or something worse . . .’ The irony of people today praising Stopes is captured by Anthony Ozimic of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC): ‘Praising Marie Stopes as a woman of distinction should be as unacceptable as praising Adolf Hitler as a great leader. Both promoted compulsory sterilisation and the elimination of society’s most vulnerable members to achieve what they called racial progress.’ 

8. The BBC website states that the Catholic Church was Stopes’s fiercest critic. It fails to clarify that it was the Catholic Church which most opposed her appalling eugenic beliefs. In the 1920s, a legal victory against the rising eugenic tide was won by Dr Sutherland, with the support of the Catholic church, over Marie Stopes. Sutherland opposed eugenics long before he became a Catholic. Yet Stopes is lauded today as a feminist hero, while the story of the eugenics libel trial, and the Catholic role in trying to stop eugenics, has been either overlooked or dismissed as simplistic Catholic opposition to contraception.

9. Moreover, Dr Sutherland and others were actively trying to prevent and cure tuberculosis, a disease of poverty, while at the same time influential eugenicists decried their efforts as a waste of time. Eugenicists considered tuberculosis was a ‘friend of the race’ because it was a natural check on the ‘unfit’ and poor, killing them before they could reproduce.

How ironic that Stopes, who describes poor children as ‘puny-faced, gaunt, blotchy, ill-balanced, feeble, ungainly, withered’ is now feted as a feminist heroine, and Sutherland who tried to treat and heal them is forgotten.

10. The deliberate excision of Stopes’s eugenic legacy has made her a secular saint. The abortion industry in particular, and liberalism in general, have effectively erased Stopes’s racism and hatred of the poor (such inconvenient historical facts) from their collective memory. Yet the truth is that Marie Stopes was not motivated by a kind of early feminism but rather ‘by the urge to reduce the numbers of the burgeoning lumpen proletariat’.

Stopes and other eugenicists endorsed legalised birth control because the working class was too ‘drunken and ignorant’ to be trusted to keep its own numbers down.

This all helps to explain why Marie Stopes International, arguably the biggest abortion and birth control provider in the world, focuses on providing cheap abortions in developing countries directly to the poorest women in the world.

Recall, as I quoted above, the MSI website: ‘The way we provide contraception and safe abortion services has been shaped, to a large extent, by our history. And by the lives of two pioneers of the family planning movement, Dr Marie Stopes and Dr Tim Black.’

I agree with them: Marie Stopes’s eugenic and racist goals in family planning shape MSI even today:

The truth is that liberal abortion legislation and ‘safe abortion’ provision in developing countries has no effect on maternal mortality rates ie women’s health (note, an attempt to discredit these findings had to be retracted!) Liberalising abortion laws increases numbers of abortions but what genuinely improves maternal mortality rates and health and thus truly helps women (and their unborn children) is education, nutrition, clean water, sanitation and maternal health care.

It seems that a neo-colonial and eugenic agenda carries on, with a different cloak and mantle and exported to a different part of the world, but with the same underlying agenda that Marie Stopes had.

History repeats itself, but in such cunning disguise that we never detect the resemblance until the damage is done.’ (Sydney J Harris)


If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Philippa Taylor
Philippa Taylor
Philippa Taylor is Head of Public Policy at the Christian Medical Fellowship @PhilippaTaylor_

Sign up for TCW Daily

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.