STAGE hypnotists who convince audience members that cold is hot, or that they cannot see, may have something to teach us about Covid. Many normal, decent people, including government ministers, NHS chiefs and media communicators, have their head in the sand or become angry and upset when faced with facts that contradict their faith in the vaccines. The Belgian psychologist Dr Mattias Desmet says widespread acceptance of Covid untruths in general can be understood as a form of mass hypnosis, rooted in insecurity.
A growing recognition in the UK of lockdown lunacy has not so far extended to the Covid jabs. In fact, according to this Telegraph report, UK regulators are working with the World Health Organisation on a plan to make them routine.
As it dawns on the public, NHS staff, care home workers and others that most of their ‘lockdown’ sacrifices were both cruel and useless, it seems that the illusion of ‘safe and effective’ Covid jabs is becoming even more important to maintaining the hypnotic trance.
At some point, however, it must break, and it is surely important that those who understand the damage being caused should speak up now, before thousands more are harmed, and before genuinely life-saving vaccines (which do not include the flu jab) are brought into disrepute.
Dr Jessica Rose, the feisty Canadian analyst whose work we featured here earlier this month, is one of those who refuses to be silenced, despite suffering censorship and abuse. ‘Anyone taking these products now – I’m really sorry to sound crazy, because I know this is hard to hear for many people – but if you’ve taken these products you’ve entered into an experiment,’ she says.
And that experiment has failed.
Rose is an immunologist and molecular biologist who specialises in investigating infectious disease mechanisms. Last September, she told the US Food and Drug Administration’s vaccines advisory committee that adverse event reports for Covid-associated products alone were already more than 1,000 per cent higher in 2021 than total annual reports for all other vaccines given over the past ten years. A comparative analysis of flu data showed the increase was real, and a clear signal of ‘huge risks that, in my opinion, outweigh any potential benefits associated with these products, especially for children’.
Her estimate of the actual rate of adverse events, based on Pfizer trial data and taking into account under-reporting, is that it is 31 times higher than the numbers registered with VAERS, the US programme for monitoring vaccine safety. Other analysts have come up with similar estimates.
Bearing this in mind, the numbers injured are immense.
In October, Rose co-authored with the top American cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough a report on adverse effects on the heart, mainly myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), following the first or second Covid injection. Analysis of VAERS data revealed that young people aged 13 to 23 were at significantly higher risk, with about four out of five of the cases occurring in males.
Within eight weeks of the rollout for 12-15-year-olds, the study found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination group compared with the background myocarditis rates for those ages. Following the second dose, a five-fold increase in myocarditis rate was seen in 15-year-olds, compared with the first jab.
The study was peer-reviewed and approved for publication in a cardiology journal, but withdrawn without explanation by the publisher, Elsevier, five days before Rose was due to speak at a panel that voted to extend the vaccination drive to 5-11-year-olds.
Since then, with several other papers reaching similar conclusions (see for example here and here) and numerous reports of young male athletes collapsing with heart problems, the threat that the jab can pose to the heart is increasingly well recognised.
Other VAERS data searches indicate that damage to health comes in a variety of forms that many would not connect to the jab.
For example, when Rose used key terms identifying female reproductive issues, she found reports of 43,350 women affected, mostly in the 20-50 age groups. The codes she used can be seen here. They do not include common adverse reactions like headache and fatigue.
‘This is so important for our species,’ she wrote. ‘I still cannot believe that this is what I am doing with my time – trying to convince humans why it’s a good idea to consider what is contained in a syringe that has been connected to an unprecedented number of adverse events in every adverse event collection system in the world . . .
‘Ladies, if you are on the fence about whether or not to keep proceeding with injecting yourselves with what I am calling “this shit”, please consider waiting. There is nothing wrong with taking time to assess a complex situation. In fact, it is quite intelligent and self-responsible to do so.’
The same analysis disclosed events in ten baby girls (the 0-5 age group), nine of whom were from a foreign data set included in VAERS. Seven died. A five-month-old and a six-month-old succumbed to what was described as ‘vaginal haemorrhage’.
Rose, a research fellow with Israel’s Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, has also run searches of the database highlighting eye, ear and skin problems in the wake of the Covid injection.
Here are her findings.
Eyes (as of 7 January): 74,080 adverse event reports, including 1,038 people who reported blindness. The great majority were in those aged 25-plus, but there were 334 in the 0-5 age group, suffering events such as ‘eye swelling’ and ‘eye movement disorder’. Forty-five per cent of the reports were made immediately and 65 per cent within 24 hours.
Ears: 659,294 reports, including balance issues, dizziness and tinnitus. Mostly among those aged 20 to 80, but with 341 babies (0-5) affected.
Skin: 156,769 reports, including 128 babies. Many of the reactions were immediate and probably at the injection site, Rose says, but there was also a cluster of reports on day 7 post-injection, indicating a delayed immune system reaction.
In the UK, nearly 2,000 deaths and more than one million adverse events have been reported to regulators in the wake of Covid shots. In Europe, the equivalent figures to date are 37,927 fatalities, and nearly 3,500,000 reactions.
The ‘head in the sand’ approach to these staggering statistics is to maintain that they are mostly coincidental, and that any problems are outweighed by the benefits of the jab.
But heart problems have been shown by Oxford University researchers to be greater in men under 40 than risks to the heart following Covid infection, and commentators have argued that the Oxford study underestimates the relative risk to the over-40s as well.
What’s more, an analysis of official data comparing death rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated people in England has found ‘no reliable evidence that the vaccine reduces all-cause mortality’, the one crucial test of effectiveness.
Earlier this month, Professor Ehud Qimron, head of microbiology and immunology at Tel Aviv University, published an impassioned open letter criticising the Israeli Ministry of Health’s management of Covid, headed ‘It’s time to admit failure’.
It is worth reading in full, as a summary of just about everything that has gone wrong in so many countries, including the UK.
Qimron wrote: ‘You have destroyed the education of our children and their future. You made children feel guilty, scared, smoke, drink, get addicted, drop out, and quarrel, as school principals around the country attest. You have harmed livelihoods, the economy, human rights, mental health, and physical health.
‘You slandered colleagues who did not surrender to you, you turned the people against each other, divided society and polarised the discourse. You branded, without any scientific basis, people who chose not to get vaccinated as enemies of the public and as spreaders of disease. You promote, in an unprecedented way, a draconian policy of discrimination, denial of rights and selection of people, including children, for their medical choice. A selection that lacks any epidemiological justification . . .
‘The only emergency now is that you still set policies and hold huge budgets for propaganda and psychological engineering instead of directing them to strengthen the health care system. This emergency must stop!’